Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200220130149.26283-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <20200220130149.26283-2-geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <CACRpkdbgsR1n1qj3HmQWcEjeDdN85N1Mw8kLOUAeDjESW36MDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <d2b87102-fdf3-f22f-8477-5b2105d9583b@gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdZwaKA-Gq4wjkPZ_VFiOgNgvLPnYmx4A3AFE-0eNNjQpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ecde265b-f451-7514-2265-cf4d3024690b@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:57:34 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZwaKA-Gq4wjkPZ_VFiOgNgvLPnYmx4A3AFE-0eNNjQpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/28/20 4:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:18 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
>>> Patch applied with Frank's Review tag.
>>
>> I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches
>> fix.
>>
>> I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere,
>> immediately followed by Geert's patch series.  This way, after
>> applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's
>> series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass.
>>
>> Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via
>> your tree or Rob's tree?
> 
> I see Rob already applied the test.
> 
> I do not personally bother much about which order problems
> get solved but I guess if Rob can back out the patch I can apply
> it to my tree instead, before these patches. for some time,
> before I start pulling stuff on top.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 

At this point, if it is a lot of trouble or confusion, I would not
bother undoing the commits that have been done.  I'll leave it up
to you and Rob to coordinate if you do decide to undo.

-Frank