Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp2719157ybf; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:13:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvFVCJ4TRwS7yrjC4sUSexXWUL9tnZ2cQxkYOqfOXFtrhh7XVq6hcATJVtoZSMd3zPGvWrv X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a59:: with SMTP id z25mr1082296otm.315.1583187220645; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:13:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583187220; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XhGmKT/WalNS+w3bYrx8C4ztmvMo7/+bpgvvJmtpVLFkrFvcVv4AX3wHRZsjqHUT3w V8WU3/Pd6nxy/7WOKTQPwurcqOEj5HSHodDBJpzU32of7YxYnIIxeNma7MbpvQGcXqKi gCFZMC+uzKHP8/EPum0WAyWg68BAQIrN23e1rq3dPL2kbiBl5u5f/cbatxQG9Vn6D9U1 rBne6YT8TQsHupu/SV9rlv/LRC6RFak3Sz32pCMLNsiQz6msbW8IX7RO4+MOEPqXqp38 Xciip1/TIhVJG0w4Yn24oG3WfesCr1vSlcmvf/pvkskjmCIcjvnouVNy0CpAUvXePQ5J nvqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=/huGO/VS9bkP9816xRhtwWedABimDDXVhljsBinpCIc=; b=bqA0ZQrBGjs30munB42hJ+PthVJMTy+2nv5YwUQzqghKNiorZPVPGeRNtwNtRd738i D5D8f6z1jon+COFnILpEYmZ65Ut4TME/EmCQras8fMDxbXNpRAv3X0u/4A0hn3ocPaxH yI6uBhXfGuogfcsqQ/MqCe8UkH5xoidxZNwsRN62A1Q6tM7PaXo6Bm4vs/DiLC6BChfv MjN7C5XYvduaLZZjNdCGpQpJMHlBrqt/8Ux1732YMEBEkH/NBVf78yELefEEZb0w/avn EL0nwt/bHjQ0msbW/8QsFTNXH5aD11BVH8E5WW7948L6vtSRryRaBV1VxgrXxpTPKN85 wXPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=0q18elEU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k19si6726981otr.52.2020.03.02.14.13.26; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=0q18elEU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726810AbgCBWLq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:11:46 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35186 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725781AbgCBWLq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:11:46 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46D4921739; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:11:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583187105; bh=nmmuEpxmCjc0aKsztvjVXQXja7/rg6W/P3XUJuNzzKc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0q18elEUkRaxUtioBVBS0syNq3bikiyHmmqzQeYjY9AB/5R2JiOBn5bl54IyRZzmt nLXzchT4MCXx8AoVjhcjC4USN/LyuG9qHeJn15K86f757YVqpUM0rb9wmH5F0hqdSj AWBD+bnAAE4uWywcgoAr66YGhiWsV1IXA2regTt8= Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:11:44 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alex Shi Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/20] mm/lru: introduce TestClearPageLRU Message-Id: <20200302141144.b30abe0d89306fd387e13a92@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1583146830-169516-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1583146830-169516-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <1583146830-169516-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:00:17 +0800 Alex Shi wrote: > Combined PageLRU check and ClearPageLRU into one function by new > introduced func TestClearPageLRU. This function will be used as page > isolation precondition. > > No functional change yet. > > ... > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -2588,9 +2588,8 @@ static void commit_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > pgdat = page_pgdat(page); > spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); > > - if (PageLRU(page)) { > + if (TestClearPageLRU(page)) { > lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat); > - ClearPageLRU(page); > del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_lru(page)); > } else The code will now get exclusive access of the page->flags cacheline and will dirty that cacheline, even for !PageLRU() pages. What is the performance impact of this?