Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030577AbWBNOBX (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:01:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030576AbWBNOBW (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:01:22 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:32133 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030577AbWBNOBW (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:01:22 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:59:16 +0100 To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, dhazelton@enter.net Cc: nix@esperi.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidsen@tmr.com, chris@gnome-de.org, axboe@suse.de Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <43F1E234.nailMWZAGZIXB@burner> References: <787b0d920601241923k5cde2bfcs75b89360b8313b5b@mail.gmail.com> <1139615496.10395.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43F088AB.nailKUSB18RM0@burner> <200602131901.01158.dhazelton@enter.net> In-Reply-To: <200602131901.01158.dhazelton@enter.net> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1600 Lines: 34 "D. Hazelton" wrote: > On Monday 13 February 2006 08:24, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Christian Neumair wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 10.02.2006, 16:06 -0500 schrieb Bill Davidsen: > > > > The kernel could provide a list of devices by category. It doesn't have > > > > to name them, run scripts, give descriptions, or paint them blue. Just > > > > a list of all block devices, tapes, by major/minor and category (ie. > > > > block, optical, floppy) would give the application layer a chance to do > > > > it's own interpretation. > > > > > > Introducing more than interface for doing the same thing can be very > > > confusing and counter-productive. You'll create new, undocumented or > > > semi-documented interfaces which will lead to a dependency chaos. > > > > So you concur with me that the fact that Linux introduced another interface > > for SCSI was onfusing and counter-productive. > > And look - ide-scsi is going away. So that "new" interface is disappearing. Try to find out what's new and what's old. J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/