Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp3165412ybf; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:31:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuGgftXD9UnpcMlpZSaEYc00/tOKZCU152jhgZN1ekpPtk7OaJfTMHBNZqkDHiXyDu7tIHs X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:7dd:: with SMTP id f29mr1746948oij.67.1583224280421; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:31:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583224280; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=U+RylMt8Tbm6i5zWFZOZqYEY3gFw1FjV9yzId/4jRT9l7YVTEjqahxQqLD7NRN1qPo 0t8gmrE+hn2GjBnZ3iMhgTFJnP8LcKKJmgHjtHQGmNHsaDR94fCQS4O3Ot58YJc9ENZL Gqd8n3+KylCZEXOFDMvRyAYXKjYESxJzIFo6bVgrBsStUwLrZbZ20AP0KN2i3aSm0kWC ObJw5eRnPbmqWrrJVyWUN8I+9EfpXcQoC18Z0JZtOVJbUoM49BXxHpj55UGP+PaNXwCm HwBwAL9/bbUkXbRPh0ZgcTYnl69K+7phQOEGkcJXX1xyrgEfZ47fdX+iSXHge1uiyeDa Q3tA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Ol3ldL5OMqioPTn/m2oRgOTBmWSV/zAAL5Ts8NcMZU4=; b=NvT6IfVdgaTROiYS1LUCVo25etVlXFR7N0AIQSXj7xoWrJbx42eir7jWrzSoTOxsBc linJurCAOKKCs1saaEBrrmw0NkVDEEgHTCh0kulGpwjZXCQ5RF+bJT80y4j2cUSM6A0O SKT3pdJ2WjuW5mmxuT7PVUhMAOOen2oXYIKD1EEGTGChoGoXj8JShr4Wn7mJp5FGK4If hohS2klNDG6vzF2f9KTJKnoiCc8c/6VAem1i6byslgNc7BSb011t8/G96PRHtfVvYfax t2L3KAbc+qDkGiqokpc+nx8NzFwOo41MTa0FUfmSWLHKEGm8oyIqYprSBGlWpXvLrmh1 Xc2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k16si7609818oiw.128.2020.03.03.00.31.08; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727587AbgCCIan convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 03:30:43 -0500 Received: from smtp.h3c.com ([60.191.123.56]:58557 "EHLO h3cspam01-ex.h3c.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725818AbgCCIan (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 03:30:43 -0500 Received: from DAG2EX10-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com ([10.8.0.73]) by h3cspam01-ex.h3c.com with ESMTPS id 0238TnnQ033014 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:29:49 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from tian.xianting@h3c.com) Received: from DAG2EX10-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.73) by DAG2EX10-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:29:51 +0800 Received: from BJHUB02-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.63.20.170) by DAG2EX10-IDC.srv.huawei-3com.com (10.8.0.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:29:51 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.99.212.201) by rndsmtp.h3c.com (10.63.20.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:29:41 +0800 From: Xianting Tian To: CC: , , Xianting Tian Subject: [PATCH] mm/filemap.c: clear page error before actual read Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:25:41 +0800 Message-ID: <20200303082541.33354-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.99.212.201] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-DNSRBL: X-MAIL: h3cspam01-ex.h3c.com 0238TnnQ033014 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mount failure issue happens under the scenario: Application totally forked dozens of threads to mount the same number of cramfs images separately in docker, but several mounts failed with high probability. Mount failed due to the checking result of the page (read from the superblock of loop dev) is not uptodate after wait_on_page_locked(page) returned in function cramfs_read: wait_on_page_locked(page); if (!PageUptodate(page)) { ... } The reason of the checking result of the page not uptodate: systemd-udevd read the loopX dev before mount, because the status of loopX is Lo_unbound at this time, so loop_make_request directly trigger the calling of io_end handler end_buffer_async_read, which called SetPageError(page). So It caused the page can't be set to uptodate in function end_buffer_async_read: if(page_uptodate && !PageError(page)) { SetPageUptodate(page); } Then mount operation is performed, it used the same page which is just accessed by systemd-udevd above, Because this page is not uptodate, it will launch a actual read via submit_bh, then wait on this page by calling wait_on_page_locked(page). When the I/O of the page done, io_end handler end_buffer_async_read is called, because no one cleared the page error(during the whole read path of mount), which is caused by systemd-udevd, so this page is still in "PageError" status, which is can't be set to uptodate in function end_buffer_async_read, then caused mount failure. But sometimes mount succeed even through systemd-udeved read loop dev just before, The reason is systemd-udevd launched other loopX read just between step 3.1 and 3.2, the steps as below: 1, loopX dev default status is Lo_unbound; 2, systemd-udved read loopX dev (page is set to PageError); 3, mount operation 1) set loopX status to Lo_bound; ==>systemd-udevd read loopX dev<== 2) read loopX dev(page has no error) 3) mount succeed As the loopX dev status is set to Lo_bound after step 3.1, so the other loopX dev read by systemd-udevd will go through the whole I/O stack, part of the call trace as below: SYS_read vfs_read do_sync_read blkdev_aio_read generic_file_aio_read do_generic_file_read: ClearPageError(page); mapping->a_ops->readpage(filp, page); here, mapping->a_ops->readpage() is blkdev_readpage. In latest kernel, some function name changed, the call trace as below: blkdev_read_iter generic_file_read_iter generic_file_buffered_read: /* * A previous I/O error may have been due to temporary * failures, eg. multipath errors. * PG_error will be set again if readpage fails. */ ClearPageError(page); /* Start the actual read.The read will unlock the page*/ error = mapping->a_ops->readpage(filp, page); We can see ClearPageError(page) is called before the actual read, then the read in step 3.2 succeed, page has no error. The patch is to add the calling of ClearPageError just before the actual read of mount read path. Without the patch, the call trace as below when performing mount: Do_mount ramfs_read cramfs_blkdev_read read_mapping_page read_cache_page do_read_cache_page: filler(data, page); or mapping->a_ops->readpage(data, page); With the patch, the call trace as below when performing mount: Do_mount cramfs_read cramfs_blkdev_read read_mapping_page read_cache_page do_read_cache_page: ClearPageError(page); <==new add filler(data, page); or mapping->a_ops->readpage(data, page); With the patch, mount operation trigger the calling of ClearPageError(page) before the actual read, the page has no error if no additional page error happen when I/O done. Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian --- mm/filemap.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 178447827..d65428f26 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -2755,6 +2755,13 @@ static struct page *do_read_cache_page(struct address_space *mapping, } filler: + /* + * A previous I/O error may have been due to temporary + * failures. + * Clear page error before actual read, PG_error will be + * set again if read page fails. + */ + ClearPageError(page); if (filler) err = filler(data, page); else -- 2.17.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ???ʼ????丽???????»??????ŵı?????Ϣ???????ڷ??͸???????ַ???г? ?ĸ??˻?Ⱥ?顣??ֹ?κ??????????κ???ʽʹ?ã?????????????ȫ???????ֵ?й¶?????ơ? ??ɢ???????ʼ??е???Ϣ?????????????˱??ʼ????????????绰???ʼ?֪ͨ?????˲?ɾ???? ?ʼ??? This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!