Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161106AbWBNQNO (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:13:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161109AbWBNQNO (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:13:14 -0500 Received: from web81911.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.190]:39271 "HELO web81911.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161106AbWBNQNN (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:13:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=a4pVo5ZXZ6T8MEHCCvqBTq285rWdTBXPQ+WinTU1QrRM9/6DnksUBhmXEszkLcc/qMM7/sfHJ8FydV2stWv5K7EjJKUgjM4sohD1tnPyYCL93+OZ2cdmMob4VlobuI0LLBr4JkblYDWG1tUFxDQZNlYmiKyHGR56XkUZzKuozcI= ; Message-ID: <20060214161311.68562.qmail@web81911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:13:11 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Frost Subject: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Joerg Schilling Cc: jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, austin-group-l@opengroup.org In-Reply-To: <43F1F56C.7000307@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1406 Lines: 39 --- "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup. > > Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years. > > > > Surely you're not suggesting that TOG's job is to rubber-stamp bad > Solaris decisions... No, he's suggesting that precedent should apply across unixen. It makes sense to Joerg, who programs for the lot of them like they share object inheritance. This is sometimes more problematic than others (vis a vis cdrecord). Joerg is disinclined to support the kind of compulsive re-engineering that Linus encourages, even though you might do it because it would make more sense re-engineered a certain way. If I've understood correctly (and charitably), he prefers compatibility over novelty. I myself like functional novelty over conformant compatibility in the adiaphora. Matt > > -hpa > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/