Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp3224796ybf; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 01:53:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtL6M6B3i5wgsJZLdzgU8YJUT1N2ygRUZMTXcr8VRmkBKaszrPAkJ5ZHFZN8wyFgARYydyC X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2f05:: with SMTP id h5mr2778122otb.316.1583229201796; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 01:53:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583229201; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aZ5DZuO2y16ZL95NjP6/Dv+ceB3qok7Ysw9DwfU3P4IqSfdw1ab9G1FjgxqEMXOfaC bPEI7KvkdqCiX/luKLZt4JdfIow09N9SNrVHzo3tWCzvj5ghI1yyC/0dTkGWYd7yX8hv Nti8s1rJ8/oePZRgg5+UKWZsfs+6d5QrVvns/TRo5nZmQBDhthbNh0HiO8yaZu98Q6Kq aySjj27O/fS7hm/jTgwk+48jGftXsAvRoB6S4BBT8zr7mK95MecRK+SIWLOoEuuCHSdG t6IE3vDV1KwQX+9UMRHRMaA8cY8iJBeQwuEZo7tQcUj9ZTmqLq6zFrg06nYt6UJipN+h rK+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=OFAbsG5HWoclZnIV9XPSSAk6vvgxrvs2Q+JEJtUgXFk=; b=SHErM4C6U8lieBw3haPi+W692vQlcOcNmzrXjsyMhAMKH9kbhu9t+oNprzgyINuVcA 9fQtL7gO4by7tZ3sVErX5fhPylDxnUumcA/bm3SeIMxAOzgDe1nzNgaFspCd1DN6B28Z K04w+to3sjEPTvvm5qeAynQXKczOOYgvGC5/HonW345x6XDWKRDSlcxsa2dR8FpJy3au orjxha1r8drSQn0nNchbAjdMcH2ft2Lc+BScBWLaVCZ1QiHnTz4a2QTW+l+Cf7bcue0A QRrFaBrOi0Kxg1SnDrhDwPJZ0Vm2MMTNu9+Wh17ZENbGtt5s52PHnKQ+ZZOjjbHMgfC2 P78A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l17si7808857otq.59.2020.03.03.01.53.09; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 01:53:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727335AbgCCJkQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:40:16 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:35416 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726694AbgCCJkQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:40:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id c7so3510851edu.2 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 01:40:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OFAbsG5HWoclZnIV9XPSSAk6vvgxrvs2Q+JEJtUgXFk=; b=mgg3I5gwzgI49ZeZGd4YWVDz8HmUo6mc1Z/+cAPN2MZh0Bqmc9/d4BIYYZ77APAcI+ nDaIx3oYH7h8Xi1ZKwcp1ewy0QxsFStYRFyi76HMRwd8D3cM1lad+doH9nU/nOoqZOHZ mK/N7Y11V7TStciicF03I/KlX1eaMSaES30LH7QDkTCIXbD6At4O3I7esngnGVFSGwsH 8gF7ZDOwRF5Jv4KvF1BHnObcUUQD8/CvlL7Af90M8JLC2zbFfV1f2KaT39mxH76+NBRu KE6JWrkjSmdFEQ1l5pmuRE7G11pvixJEi0MbeOwqcguOl77mOYYxpeSNmAaU1BlGV5OT G7bg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2Zy4BSj8T4tvHf/DZiorS4uvPRkY256/CSuuKzntYq+QCNS+I/ W5opwad7/SVLrDZddiA9evc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:81ca:: with SMTP id e10mr1193257ejx.157.1583228414697; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 01:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com (54-240-197-230.amazon.com. [54.240.197.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dx3sm163244ejb.0.2020.03.03.01.40.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Mar 2020 01:40:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenbus: req->body should be updated before req->state To: Dongli Zhang , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jgross@suse.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, joe.jin@oracle.com References: <20200303015859.18813-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <2f175c30-b6b9-5f21-6cf3-2ee89e0c475e@xen.org> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:40:12 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200303015859.18813-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 03/03/2020 01:58, Dongli Zhang wrote: > The req->body should be updated before req->state is updated and the > order should be guaranteed by a barrier. > > Otherwise, read_reply() might return req->body = NULL. > > Below is sample callstack when the issue is reproduced on purpose by > reordering the updates of req->body and req->state and adding delay in > code between updates of req->state and req->body. > > [ 22.356105] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > [ 22.361185] CPU: 2 PID: 52 Comm: xenwatch Not tainted 5.5.0xen+ #6 > [ 22.366727] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS ... > [ 22.372245] RIP: 0010:_parse_integer_fixup_radix+0x6/0x60 > ... ... > [ 22.392163] RSP: 0018:ffffb2d64023fdf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 > [ 22.395933] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 75746e7562755f6d RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 22.400871] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffb2d64023fdfc RDI: 75746e7562755f6d > [ 22.405874] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000000001e8 R09: 0000000000cdcdcd > [ 22.410945] R10: ffffb2d6402ffe00 R11: ffff9d95395eaeb0 R12: ffff9d9535935000 > [ 22.417613] R13: ffff9d9526d4a000 R14: ffff9d9526f4f340 R15: ffff9d9537654000 > [ 22.423726] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d953bc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 22.429898] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 22.434342] CR2: 000000c4206a9000 CR3: 00000001ea3fc002 CR4: 00000000001606e0 > [ 22.439645] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > [ 22.444941] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > [ 22.450342] Call Trace: > [ 22.452509] simple_strtoull+0x27/0x70 > [ 22.455572] xenbus_transaction_start+0x31/0x50 > [ 22.459104] netback_changed+0x76c/0xcc1 [xen_netfront] > [ 22.463279] ? find_watch+0x40/0x40 > [ 22.466156] xenwatch_thread+0xb4/0x150 > [ 22.469309] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 > [ 22.472198] kthread+0x10e/0x130 > [ 22.474925] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 > [ 22.477946] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 > [ 22.480968] Modules linked in: xen_kbdfront xen_fbfront(+) xen_netfront xen_blkfront > [ 22.486783] ---[ end trace a9222030a747c3f7 ]--- > [ 22.490424] RIP: 0010:_parse_integer_fixup_radix+0x6/0x60 > > The "while" is changed to "do while" so that wait_event() is used as a > barrier. The correct barrier for read_reply() should be virt_rmb(). While on x86, this is equivalent to barrier(), on Arm this will be a dmb(ish) to prevent the processor re-ordering memory access. Therefore the barrier in test_reply() (called by wait_event()) is not going to be sufficient for Arm. > > Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang > --- > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c | 2 ++ > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c > index d239fc3c5e3d..852ed161fc2a 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c > @@ -313,6 +313,8 @@ static int process_msg(void) > req->msg.type = state.msg.type; > req->msg.len = state.msg.len; > req->body = state.body; > + /* write body, then update state */ > + virt_wmb(); > req->state = xb_req_state_got_reply; > req->cb(req); > } else > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c > index ddc18da61834..f5b0a6a72ad3 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static bool test_reply(struct xb_req_data *req) > > static void *read_reply(struct xb_req_data *req) > { > - while (req->state != xb_req_state_got_reply) { > + do { > wait_event(req->wq, test_reply(req)); > > if (!xenbus_ok()) > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void *read_reply(struct xb_req_data *req) > if (req->err) > return ERR_PTR(req->err); > > - } > + } while (req->state != xb_req_state_got_reply); > > return req->body; > } > Cheers, -- Julien Grall