Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422748AbWBNSHd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:07:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422747AbWBNSHd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:07:33 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:31916 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422748AbWBNSHc (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:07:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:07:26 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Joerg Schilling cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, drepper@redhat.com, austin-group-l@opengroup.org Subject: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter In-Reply-To: <43F1F2C2.nailMWZGOQDYR@burner> Message-ID: References: <43EEACA7.5020109@zytor.com> <43F09320.nailKUSI1GXEI@burner> <43F1F2C2.nailMWZGOQDYR@burner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 717 Lines: 22 >> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces? >> >> chownfn maybe. (fd + name) > >I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup. >Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years. > This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one. Thank you, Jan Engelhardt -- | Software Engineer and Linux/Unix Network Administrator | Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/ | jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/