Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp3830530ybf; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:44:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vulDi6foQzMTZMA6kO5wIN3S2hQRj2sUs0Fs6BjX84xUsczaN3Tl8M+elcfo+65LBZQER2/ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c13:: with SMTP id f19mr4596677otq.175.1583271866174; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:44:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583271866; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ghuQ4ScjKv4Ws1xMQMAcn9ZRqNcKhA2KZIP1wRR04n0vt0TJFMfoG3LnArDIu5pHVE bw3XY0edo1iIiwcUXGffL5PGlj+WXlygVGrjwSHqyBEF0vSD3uXRRQuvNdsfydbrLPbP +4rZkHiN6XBl37/fe0kSAH31JJm/FvDfV3yx9CXWi/77/zPhxhEG739k4eKkMHsqrEXS bvwqWYZ3s/eRZp/ot4HaqfBaKvoWYRcWCyyYSgyZ74pkwWYaIPJhDJP2r/r4qSuWPlyV EGMyZNozcW9d4baBC+YVQedNHrU6GVlgbqGT+Xkn8hLrnoHtdeT8ZRvE8TJRIcjGeNjp NJCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=PBhHEEvkyvTqJUIeskr6E9PxwbWHltx4bOMIa0nWNlI=; b=L7XWloZJXVsqAFrcr8mIFZ+F1MAb1dH0n31BZLNTq4rRhlcnrgYHG1amrCmKiFhxD6 v0ejbnPUrTITp0es++59cYk5g6o2Ev+Aw9yMUbVanC792qXArmtvg3+rtlcAdmmAbh5T HEPausImyoysQJ04VbrS4IqldDFckMFUS2MV0CIaoYFdAc8W41aOHOi/IaORoqk9Aps/ efdK2G0HwFdk4Y83ric1ALKfT6CgV0fQSGMuUcNT5XbWzBN0wIRGO+M5c6iNh1pTmqg2 p5weyEITb1xn6GzjSUILI0D6FJILSx7yGigQf/l3v7Bhu0FKLmFSDg3WKA6Tis8qbyR7 BH2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 88si1441854otv.12.2020.03.03.13.44.14; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730750AbgCCThF (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:37:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:35700 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730691AbgCCThE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:37:04 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id c7so5952063edu.2 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:37:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PBhHEEvkyvTqJUIeskr6E9PxwbWHltx4bOMIa0nWNlI=; b=k0CN52kfaQSrU0vhHAsHAaeZKCT/mzcnizfqKi9Ww28fmClOjKMhv5QxYf0nhbSv5f WsmJKV3XkebOq7gvuwlHq/ER1sJu2EM4SvpYnhuZ4QBLjTA6KIDTTj4XkfvOme7ta48F rg9ITvUV5abS+JVxJAqqvCFmkZn+X4oAixtjGrfuVSmwfFESBySd1O7lQuHwMnVNUKws PUupLqzTtMcVz7YESyLHUmDYBVgmeX3QPhPDo30FPww/nGyV3lsktqVfj/omYQKfOTHO rYctsYn95+v5dcLaWR8CccBpSy4tr5Cfr0ZAF22phQjQuhnqfVbHQfAPMD3peSIzIj5Q ITtw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2OD7aPTNT9rMLcQX17fGbHeIUkLYrGTf/rigBeNvkT4ireScEE PyMp+dDB8cTZ9VXZqpOx740= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cfc6:: with SMTP id r6mr5340823edy.15.1583264223101; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:37:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com (54-240-197-230.amazon.com. [54.240.197.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v25sm976168edx.89.2020.03.03.11.37.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:37:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xenbus: req->body should be updated before req->state To: Dongli Zhang , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, joe.jin@oracle.com References: <20200303184752.20821-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <4ed129f9-ff23-f228-6833-77e37c2bb7b2@xen.org> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 19:37:01 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200303184752.20821-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 03/03/2020 18:47, Dongli Zhang wrote: > The req->body should be updated before req->state is updated and the > order should be guaranteed by a barrier. > > Otherwise, read_reply() might return req->body = NULL. > > Below is sample callstack when the issue is reproduced on purpose by > reordering the updates of req->body and req->state and adding delay in > code between updates of req->state and req->body. > > [ 22.356105] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > [ 22.361185] CPU: 2 PID: 52 Comm: xenwatch Not tainted 5.5.0xen+ #6 > [ 22.366727] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS ... > [ 22.372245] RIP: 0010:_parse_integer_fixup_radix+0x6/0x60 > ... ... > [ 22.392163] RSP: 0018:ffffb2d64023fdf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 > [ 22.395933] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 75746e7562755f6d RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 22.400871] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffb2d64023fdfc RDI: 75746e7562755f6d > [ 22.405874] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000000001e8 R09: 0000000000cdcdcd > [ 22.410945] R10: ffffb2d6402ffe00 R11: ffff9d95395eaeb0 R12: ffff9d9535935000 > [ 22.417613] R13: ffff9d9526d4a000 R14: ffff9d9526f4f340 R15: ffff9d9537654000 > [ 22.423726] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d953bc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 22.429898] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 22.434342] CR2: 000000c4206a9000 CR3: 00000001ea3fc002 CR4: 00000000001606e0 > [ 22.439645] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > [ 22.444941] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > [ 22.450342] Call Trace: > [ 22.452509] simple_strtoull+0x27/0x70 > [ 22.455572] xenbus_transaction_start+0x31/0x50 > [ 22.459104] netback_changed+0x76c/0xcc1 [xen_netfront] > [ 22.463279] ? find_watch+0x40/0x40 > [ 22.466156] xenwatch_thread+0xb4/0x150 > [ 22.469309] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 > [ 22.472198] kthread+0x10e/0x130 > [ 22.474925] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 > [ 22.477946] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 > [ 22.480968] Modules linked in: xen_kbdfront xen_fbfront(+) xen_netfront xen_blkfront > [ 22.486783] ---[ end trace a9222030a747c3f7 ]--- > [ 22.490424] RIP: 0010:_parse_integer_fixup_radix+0x6/0x60 > > The barrier() in test_reply() is changed to virt_rmb(). The "while" is > changed to "do while" so that test_reply() is used as a read memory > barrier. > > Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang > --- > Changed since v1: > - change "barrier()" to "virt_rmb()" in test_reply() > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c | 2 ++ > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c | 11 +++++++---- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c > index d239fc3c5e3d..852ed161fc2a 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c > @@ -313,6 +313,8 @@ static int process_msg(void) > req->msg.type = state.msg.type; > req->msg.len = state.msg.len; > req->body = state.body; > + /* write body, then update state */ > + virt_wmb(); > req->state = xb_req_state_got_reply; > req->cb(req); > } else > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c > index ddc18da61834..1e14c2118861 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c > @@ -194,15 +194,18 @@ static bool test_reply(struct xb_req_data *req) > if (req->state == xb_req_state_got_reply || !xenbus_ok()) > return true; > > - /* Make sure to reread req->state each time. */ > - barrier(); > + /* > + * read req->state before other fields of struct xb_req_data > + * in the caller of test_reply(), e.g., read_reply() > + */ > + virt_rmb(); Looking at the code again, I am afraid the barrier only happen in the false case. Should not the new barrier added in the 'true' case? Cheers, -- Julien Grall