Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 06:54:08 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc:     linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] m68k: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()
Message-ID: <20200304012408.GA5014@afzalpc>
References: <cover.1582471508.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
 <00b0bf964278dd0bb3e093283994399ff796cca5.1582471508.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
 <20200229131553.GA4985@afzalpc>
 <alpine.LNX.2.22.394.2003010958170.8@nippy.intranet>
 <20200301010511.GA5195@afzalpc>
 <alpine.LNX.2.22.394.2003011337590.15@nippy.intranet>
 <20200301061327.GA5229@afzalpc>
 <alpine.LNX.2.22.394.2003021717150.8@nippy.intranet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.22.394.2003021717150.8@nippy.intranet>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Finn,

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:26:17PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:

> I had assumed that your intention was to find a consensus so that the 
> whole tree could be consistently and automatically improved

Yeah, my main goal was to get rid of setup_irq(), other things were
secondary and proceeded to achieve the removal by hook or crook, but was
caught red handed :)

> > Sometimes had a feeling as though the changes in this series is akin to 
> > cutting the foot to fit the shoe ;), but still went ahead as it was 
> > legacy code, easier & less error prone. But now based on the overall 
> > feedback, to proceed, i had to change.
> > 
> 
> Not based on feedback from me I hope -- I have no veto in this case, as 
> you can see from MAINTAINERS.

i don't know what to say, i attempted to accomodate the reviews as
much as possible, some times when opinions are conflicting i had to
take a call one way or the other, with more importance to maintainer's
view.

Regards
afzal