Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp4512287ybf; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 05:29:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtJXaFFj3aREybwVb6q/0FO0lFkBJlpejgYfQjMnzZcmNEmRvI+IxF2s/Q0P4NSo21njRNk X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6b87:: with SMTP id b7mr2399776otq.248.1583328593860; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:29:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583328593; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MOKT3b1yboDKJ3MbDp6uijuu9Y4AhoJO4cxSqLDoezsayzjJaGZMu12GH2ggDw3l7N e77u6uAhixZ5WXXnkCrYIygTyfnWKm8L5lVcf16fEoNlJYbzFMlXzjrwmEHjz7FDHmQZ 3/uCLUutXPulKJdqQDZhKlKjAV4sAUXK4skeFkzPmOJfOiiF92qjErX3nfKPo+JDbtJ2 XldMM69FJ0emTYb+uTlrybMWmrM9rhB4M/D1aJqaKYiflEZ/qd0IWHsr2TLutzBgputG vvmW074KXx/BS0h3Bc3V2rO8S5GBu7LQQg+P+0Y/8//EUBF+Vr9/Thh+j0YkC+pQKQRD jSNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=vcyjl/gf9IB6qjHUL3x/zChqzGCsLcScrsxnmpIoAjU=; b=r8CqorIn8gabjiEgdSfEBORfQ/z1JIgYcbNK8X+1rhd7eY+vYwzojlufzDKYsnhzPF 20pDgkw8NJRyXE6G14SrQKmHm/fnVFpI4WxvyT3Tr/draJH/zVvAwYxowY1d3bbtfqHd wZJpoUS61HpIKqt9SHoo5C4U8QKVG+5psi+xolkQRGNyTdqPll+/V84tpuExlX/Fu5Gf Z2DLHnZ34AsOVvj9hbZDzsqcKDvZQ3KFSHqch2/UtB51d39EHo0xckmsy/TZmbRpXFml xky34lbaBKqJjXTYysxe1T0lu3E5OJ5P7KpkFs5B/PEbpfpgP8cIqC5kOBwXpWcZzrg7 mLwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=eq5l3g1T; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 104si1085906otj.252.2020.03.04.05.29.39; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=eq5l3g1T; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388108AbgCDN2R (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:28:17 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:49726 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387919AbgCDN2R (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:28:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=vcyjl/gf9IB6qjHUL3x/zChqzGCsLcScrsxnmpIoAjU=; b=eq5l3g1Tod0dAnZbI4RkPb4doi 2dFO7PzAPS1zgq9oQM512m58g5Gc2wzNrgvVGouydIulxHhfHCPTP3zUFL6XpoGTDCbdd36NVH3mH 7Au7SnFiEDp1OBbDewb9Da2OEX33OFf0jew/JLvAhHYMNSyHun0llahx5201paync0Ls7pO2YAXgy bypnEAWWHugKhvGwdCWlHORtqxR4QQZkvlv1D7BtmwpnkEt8XTX2h0C8Q9E0dCKF441nkdH2Y+t2B Fxlw32Ip+xO6WguWKS0rTc2zIQLeUCB5QgkVwRTSrkGqv+tXon0u05MLNvPL8nFly6QP827eBzFqu Nb8cv/DQ==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j9U4K-0006L0-P1; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:28:12 +0000 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 05:28:12 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Al Viro Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] sanitized pathwalk machinery (v3) Message-ID: <20200304132812.GE29971@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200223011154.GY23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200301215125.GA873525@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200302003926.GM23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87o8tdgfu8.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200304002434.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87wo80g0bo.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200304065547.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200304065547.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:55:47AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:23:39PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Do the xfs-tests cover that sort of thing? > > The emphasis is stress testing the filesystem not the VFS but there is a > > lot of overlap between the two. > > I do run xfstests. But "runs in KVM without visible slowdowns" != "won't > cause them on 48-core bare metal". And this area (especially when it > comes to RCU mode) can be, er, interesting in that respect. > > FWIW, I'm putting together some litmus tests for pathwalk semantics - > one of the things I'd like to discuss at LSF; quite a few codepaths > are simply not touched by anything in xfstests. Might be more appropriate for LTP than xfstests? will-it-scale might be the right place for performance benchmarks.