Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:42:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:42:09 -0400 Received: from femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.15]:34471 "EHLO femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:42:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:42:25 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: forming@hotmail.com Subject: VM testing with mtest, 2.4.12-ac3 & 2.4.13pre3aa1 Message-ID: <20011018154225.A3833@cy599856-a.home.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, forming@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Editor: GNU Emacs 20.7.2 X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.12-ac2 i586 K6-3+ X-Uptime: 15:36:33 up 2:45, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.03, 0.03 From: Josh McKinney Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I sent this once before, but it seems it didn't make it to the list. I left off the vmstat output to make it smaller. If I am just crazy and it did make it to the list I am sorry. Rik or Andrea if you would like to see the vmstat output I can send it to you upon request. This is a report of the mtest01 scripts posted by rwhron@earthlink.net a day orso ago. Hardware: K6-3 450 256MB ram 122MB swap ATA/100 IBM disk All the tests were run on a fresh boot, in single user mode. The test consists of running the mtest script and playing an mpg with mpg123. The numbers are rather interesting. While the latency of the ac kernels is definitely better, the song only dropped out for a second or two in the begining but that was it. The aa kernel drops out more frequently throughout the test, but the amount of memory allocated is almost twice as much as with the ac kernels. I thought the memory allocation was strange, so I ran the tests again, and came up with the same results. I understand that it is very important to have the variables the same across the tests, which is why I ran the tests in single-user mode, and directly after a clean reboot. Hope this report helps, thanks to rwhon for the scripts, seem like a good testing tool, and thanks to AC for keeping Riel's VM alive, and thanks to Rik and Andrea for two great VM's. It is nice to see two competing ideas and how they fair against each other. <2.4.12-ac3 vanilla> Averages for 10 mtest01 runs bytes allocated: 134427443.2 User time (seconds): 2.546 System time (seconds): 1.370 Elapsed (wall clock) time: 4.798 Percent of CPU this job got: 89.1% Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 103.8 Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults: 32702 <2.4.12-ac3+riel's hogstop&cache patch> Averages for 10 mtest01 runs bytes allocated: 124885401.6 User time (seconds): 2.380 System time (seconds): 1.253 Elapsed (wall clock) time: 4.401 Percent of CPU this job got: 89.1% Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 100.2 Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults: 30363.3 <2.4.13-pre3aa1> Averages for 10 mtest01 runs bytes allocated: 288148684.8 User time (seconds): 5.496 System time (seconds): 3.003 Elapsed (wall clock) time: 12.250 Percent of CPU this job got: 68.9% Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 103.5 Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults: 70380.6 -- Linux, the choice | You will step on the night soil of many of a GNU generation -o) | countries. Kernel 2.4.12-ac2 /\ | on a i586 _\_v | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/