Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422883AbWBNX4F (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422890AbWBNX4F (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:05 -0500 Received: from mtl.rackplans.net ([65.39.167.249]:14981 "HELO innerfire.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1422883AbWBNX4D (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:55:12 -0500 (EST) From: Gerhard Mack To: Adrian Bunk cc: Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mauro Tassinari , airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions In-Reply-To: <20060213183445.GA3588@stusta.de> Message-ID: References: <20060213170945.GB6137@stusta.de> <20060213174658.GC23048@redhat.com> <20060213183445.GA3588@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2680 Lines: 75 On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:34:45 +0100 > From: Adrian Bunk > To: Linus Torvalds > Cc: Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , > Linux Kernel Mailing List , > Mauro Tassinari , airlied@linux.ie, > dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments? > > > > Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well, lspci stupidly > > suppresses the ID entirely, but the string seems to match the one that > > Dave Jones reports) may be unrelated. > > Dave's patch removes the entry for the card with the 0x5b60. > > According to his bug report, Mauro has a Radeon X300SE that should > have the 0x5b70 according to pci.ids from pciutils and that doesn't seem > to be claimed by the DRM driver (and the dmesg from the bug report > confirms that the radeon DRM driver didn't claim to be responsible for > this card). > > > DaveJ (or Mauro): since you can test this, can you test having that ID > > there but _without_ the other changes to drm in -rc1? > > > > Ie was it the addition of that particular ID, or are the other radeon > > driver changes (which haven't had as much testing) perhaps the culprit? > > > > I realize that without the ID, that card would never have been tested > > anyway, but the point being that plain 2.6.15 with _just_ that ID added > > has at least gotten more testing on other (similar) chips. So before I > > revert that particular ID, it would be nice to know that it was broken > > even with the previous radeon driver state. > > The ID removed by Dave's patch is the only ID listed for an RV370 chips > (the other RV370's aren't listed in the radeon DRM driver). > > I suspect Dave and Mauro having unrelated problems. > > > Linus > > cu > Adrian The X300 has two pci ids: 0000:05:00.0 0300: 1002:5b60 0000:05:00.1 0380: 1002:5b70 0000:05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)] 0000:05:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 [Radeon X300SE] Gerhard -- Gerhard Mack gmack@innerfire.net <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/