Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:17:15 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 05/87] sched/core: Dont skip remote tick for idle
 CPUs
Message-ID: <20200304171715.GB1852712@kroah.com>
References: <20200303174349.075101355@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200303174349.478213998@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200304151559.GB2367@duo.ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200304151559.GB2367@duo.ucw.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > [ Upstream commit 488603b815a7514c7009e6fc339d74ed4a30f343 ]
> > 
> > This will be used in the next patch to get a loadavg update from
> > nohz cpus.  The delta check is skipped because idle_sched_class
> > doesn't update se.exec_start.
> 
> I don't see the next patch queued for 4.19-stable. AFAICT this does
> not fix anything without the subsequent patch?

Ah, good catch, that patch only made it into 5.4.y and 5.5.y, I'll drop
this from the 4.19 queue, thanks.

greg k-h