Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp4740075ybf; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:43:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vub6OKUbZ9wRsQzDAW7LmBq5rKEX7lt2tdkX8kHBwse+48w5FdRtGb06bwMw1ncAFdoO93w X-Received: by 2002:a9d:75c9:: with SMTP id c9mr3475115otl.155.1583343799170; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:43:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583343799; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BfwXKiURb6Jle9Ay3J4WtyJB0A7YAUO59d+0McNYcIHqBSlG4ANjDGPbN0MR1zXMif 4uhKP1i6xaPKHjYSoWAMrpPT7dx9FwWCPa8033SbvQL8PV0MmGhFA7d9026UsVXIYCz6 VWZ+U2N5aX9aRqMdkb0cOiyYuAN6xBEqCGkCvmJwyO4Pnv1IK2WbHpBE10O7eCna5f3I L/D4vczlwfjYNVdXT8ocxntkF0MrutVq1M4PYMlCCqGYNt+0tzSYB2fWysWmYuNHRhKl +ggFdROrlBDLmtPhuPQaT3azDZEx6viIsjJXo8B7t1rcDg9T3Idms4J2ZdXXGiYUD2Lw LfDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:autocrypt :from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=XJewBuveMrAGo2TLBivFJWaWiD/jcgE1q0DMciFpN6Y=; b=oSNm/WkINlexeNJzcAxE3c/7zWWMw+hAjYZRIDpfJAFQtkNWh7IBoVYqfMxQ4C0rQm H2ed3t6nBYvjGIqOm3AM0z70V9w/wfSocrGkvz5hIgGt+1XEPvqAMOhwLCXmjeOwz/pJ S5yvl6PBwJgD1SGVb/idj4u+mdrF7fOUx8nSKEX4I8haOoL73frAmz9wkBWFELehYgZp Zz1AWBnY9IstKEv2CXVvLV3PyyIdrk6gpXDUHkJZe5W6dUEO9Io+Q9m0zcDNJAliRoAx aFR8SrNkeAh3ICqv+ULvBbfMzZ6yI+fc5uJ7/CvU8lkcq1cYVUFQLPNyVigPqrEbBgx0 HoLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j20si1529341otp.147.2020.03.04.09.43.07; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:43:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388116AbgCDRmh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:42:37 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40606 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387969AbgCDRmh (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:42:37 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 024HMlJi039413 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:42:36 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yj3esdq42-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 12:42:36 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:42:33 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:42:30 -0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 024HgT3i42270734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:42:29 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CAEA405D; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:42:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67201A4053; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:42:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc7455500831.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.85.60]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:42:28 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: 5.6-rc3: WARNING: CPU: 48 PID: 17435 at kernel/sched/fair.c:380 enqueue_task_fair+0x328/0x440 To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <1a607a98-f12a-77bd-2062-c3e599614331@de.ibm.com> <20200228163545.GA18662@vingu-book> <49a2ebb7-c80b-9e2b-4482-7f9ff938417d@de.ibm.com> From: Christian Borntraeger Autocrypt: addr=borntraeger@de.ibm.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBE6cPPgBEAC2VpALY0UJjGmgAmavkL/iAdqul2/F9ONz42K6NrwmT+SI9CylKHIX+fdf J34pLNJDmDVEdeb+brtpwC9JEZOLVE0nb+SR83CsAINJYKG3V1b3Kfs0hydseYKsBYqJTN2j CmUXDYq9J7uOyQQ7TNVoQejmpp5ifR4EzwIFfmYDekxRVZDJygD0wL/EzUr8Je3/j548NLyL 4Uhv6CIPf3TY3/aLVKXdxz/ntbLgMcfZsDoHgDk3lY3r1iwbWwEM2+eYRdSZaR4VD+JRD7p8 0FBadNwWnBce1fmQp3EklodGi5y7TNZ/CKdJ+jRPAAnw7SINhSd7PhJMruDAJaUlbYaIm23A +82g+IGe4z9tRGQ9TAflezVMhT5J3ccu6cpIjjvwDlbxucSmtVi5VtPAMTLmfjYp7VY2Tgr+ T92v7+V96jAfE3Zy2nq52e8RDdUo/F6faxcumdl+aLhhKLXgrozpoe2nL0Nyc2uqFjkjwXXI OBQiaqGeWtxeKJP+O8MIpjyGuHUGzvjNx5S/592TQO3phpT5IFWfMgbu4OreZ9yekDhf7Cvn /fkYsiLDz9W6Clihd/xlpm79+jlhm4E3xBPiQOPCZowmHjx57mXVAypOP2Eu+i2nyQrkapaY IdisDQfWPdNeHNOiPnPS3+GhVlPcqSJAIWnuO7Ofw1ZVOyg/jwARAQABzUNDaHJpc3RpYW4g Qm9ybnRyYWVnZXIgKDJuZCBJQk0gYWRkcmVzcykgPGJvcm50cmFlZ2VyQGxpbnV4LmlibS5j b20+wsF5BBMBAgAjBQJdP/hMAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQEXu8 gLWmHHy/pA/+JHjpEnd01A0CCyfVnb5fmcOlQ0LdmoKWLWPvU840q65HycCBFTt6V62cDljB kXFFxMNA4y/2wqU0H5/CiL963y3gWIiJsZa4ent+KrHl5GK1nIgbbesfJyA7JqlB0w/E/SuY NRQwIWOo/uEvOgXnk/7+rtvBzNaPGoGiiV1LZzeaxBVWrqLtmdi1iulW/0X/AlQPuF9dD1Px hx+0mPjZ8ClLpdSp5d0yfpwgHtM1B7KMuQPQZGFKMXXTUd3ceBUGGczsgIMipZWJukqMJiJj QIMH0IN7XYErEnhf0GCxJ3xAn/J7iFpPFv8sFZTvukntJXSUssONnwiKuld6ttUaFhSuSoQg OFYR5v7pOfinM0FcScPKTkrRsB5iUvpdthLq5qgwdQjmyINt3cb+5aSvBX2nNN135oGOtlb5 tf4dh00kUR8XFHRrFxXx4Dbaw4PKgV3QLIHKEENlqnthH5t0tahDygQPnSucuXbVQEcDZaL9 WgJqlRAAj0pG8M6JNU5+2ftTFXoTcoIUbb0KTOibaO9zHVeGegwAvPLLNlKHiHXcgLX1tkjC DrvE2Z0e2/4q7wgZgn1kbvz7ZHQZB76OM2mjkFu7QNHlRJ2VXJA8tMXyTgBX6kq1cYMmd/Hl OhFrAU3QO1SjCsXA2CDk9MM1471mYB3CTXQuKzXckJnxHkHOwU0ETpw8+AEQAJjyNXvMQdJN t07BIPDtbAQk15FfB0hKuyZVs+0lsjPKBZCamAAexNRk11eVGXK/YrqwjChkk60rt3q5i42u PpNMO9aS8cLPOfVft89Y654Qd3Rs1WRFIQq9xLjdLfHh0i0jMq5Ty+aiddSXpZ7oU6E+ud+X Czs3k5RAnOdW6eV3+v10sUjEGiFNZwzN9Udd6PfKET0J70qjnpY3NuWn5Sp1ZEn6lkq2Zm+G 9G3FlBRVClT30OWeiRHCYB6e6j1x1u/rSU4JiNYjPwSJA8EPKnt1s/Eeq37qXXvk+9DYiHdT PcOa3aNCSbIygD3jyjkg6EV9ZLHibE2R/PMMid9FrqhKh/cwcYn9FrT0FE48/2IBW5mfDpAd YvpawQlRz3XJr2rYZJwMUm1y+49+1ZmDclaF3s9dcz2JvuywNq78z/VsUfGz4Sbxy4ShpNpG REojRcz/xOK+FqNuBk+HoWKw6OxgRzfNleDvScVmbY6cQQZfGx/T7xlgZjl5Mu/2z+ofeoxb vWWM1YCJAT91GFvj29Wvm8OAPN/+SJj8LQazd9uGzVMTz6lFjVtH7YkeW/NZrP6znAwv5P1a DdQfiB5F63AX++NlTiyA+GD/ggfRl68LheSskOcxDwgI5TqmaKtX1/8RkrLpnzO3evzkfJb1 D5qh3wM1t7PZ+JWTluSX8W25ABEBAAHCwV8EGAECAAkFAk6cPPgCGwwACgkQEXu8gLWmHHz8 2w//VjRlX+tKF3szc0lQi4X0t+pf88uIsvR/a1GRZpppQbn1jgE44hgF559K6/yYemcvTR7r 6Xt7cjWGS4wfaR0+pkWV+2dbw8Xi4DI07/fN00NoVEpYUUnOnupBgychtVpxkGqsplJZQpng v6fauZtyEcUK3dLJH3TdVQDLbUcL4qZpzHbsuUnTWsmNmG4Vi0NsEt1xyd/Wuw+0kM/oFEH1 4BN6X9xZcG8GYUbVUd8+bmio8ao8m0tzo4pseDZFo4ncDmlFWU6hHnAVfkAs4tqA6/fl7RLN JuWBiOL/mP5B6HDQT9JsnaRdzqF73FnU2+WrZPjinHPLeE74istVgjbowvsgUqtzjPIG5pOj cAsKoR0M1womzJVRfYauWhYiW/KeECklci4TPBDNx7YhahSUlexfoftltJA8swRshNA/M90/ i9zDo9ySSZHwsGxG06ZOH5/MzG6HpLja7g8NTgA0TD5YaFm/oOnsQVsf2DeAGPS2xNirmknD jaqYefx7yQ7FJXXETd2uVURiDeNEFhVZWb5CiBJM5c6qQMhmkS4VyT7/+raaEGgkEKEgHOWf ZDP8BHfXtszHqI3Fo1F4IKFo/AP8GOFFxMRgbvlAs8z/+rEEaQYjxYJqj08raw6P4LFBqozr nS4h0HDFPrrp1C2EMVYIQrMokWvlFZbCpsdYbBI= Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:42:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20030417-4275-0000-0000-000003A86222 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20030417-4276-0000-0000-000038BD6FA6 Message-Id: <2108173c-beaa-6b84-1bc3-8f575fb95954@de.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-04_07:2020-03-04,2020-03-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003040122 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04.03.20 16:26, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 08:55, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> >> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 08:37, Christian Borntraeger >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > [...] >>>>>> --- >>>>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c >>>>>> index 3c8a379c357e..beb773c23e7d 100644 >>>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c >>>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c >>>>>> @@ -4035,8 +4035,8 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) >>>>>> __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se); >>>>>> se->on_rq = 1; >>>>>> >>>>>> + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); >>>>>> if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) { >>>>>> - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); >>>>>> check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq); >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Now running for 3 hours. I have not seen the issue yet. I can tell tomorrow if this fixes >>>>> the issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> Still running fine. I can tell for sure tomorrow, but I have the impression that this makes the >>>> WARN_ON go away. >>> >>> So I guess this change "fixed" the issue. If you want me to test additional patches, let me know. >> >> Thanks for the test. For now, I don't have any other patch to test. I >> have to look more deeply how the situation happens. >> I will let you know if I have other patch to test > > So I haven't been able to figure out how we reach this situation yet. > In the meantime I'm going to make a clean patch with the fix above. > > Is it ok if I add a reported -by and a tested-by you ? Sure- I just realized that this system has something special. Some month ago I created 2 slices $ head /etc/systemd/system/*.slice ==> /etc/systemd/system/machine-production.slice <== [Unit] Description=VM production Before=slices.target Wants=machine.slice [Slice] CPUQuota=2000% CPUWeight=1000 ==> /etc/systemd/system/machine-test.slice <== [Unit] Description=VM production Before=slices.target Wants=machine.slice [Slice] CPUQuota=300% CPUWeight=100 And the guests are then put into these slices. that also means that this test will never use more than the 2300%. No matter how much CPUs the system has.