Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp5723746ybf; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 06:00:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvD2bjuTy6KyyCi49NRCAw6coetp7PlbUQ0ILNdkPFvlBPNgeYBA3s1GQ9Pau5bZj7/tNpe X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6:: with SMTP id 6mr6790343ota.191.1583416814061; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:00:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583416814; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1GWTSqMaZwt4+wE44ryisYGxMutvkngf6DGokTY6i9jJZt2JEtQ/rmELDMfSoruiv5 BXtQtKi7Vs9hf2V8pKFPOhyELX+Xok1JLiyGnAecEjnofyx8T9rw0H6Zj7U7KTo4nx9+ hjRTM+gu72+HMn2KX1iyCaE6qJtk0kXlyUCRUUhCn58wKW6fXcL0Dc8gtqSeWb1Y1ZlG zWm23gwOrBIlMT0gtC1BG+py23CasIkHEGAAeNincR1pToTksEli6I7gA0QhgAvMRZ0M 6ILmxBzjt8fXOCNgiHtMOgHjxJg0xjcVeXE3UlphWsaKIBuL2GoVfTVIc7+/JwGHyTtH vyQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=bC4Gi/GXQeCL726G1W5oX0Hs8vIlAWVCpydxgodaRi4=; b=V9j7jX4tFNc5upSHTHR/LjnTcLSJJB0rAkKVygKAK/bzBfA5ACxGg/9L/Nl+TO8H3r dZRYI/E2drD4tACYW1/xwwtRKPa5m/Rxy12cFH6X7zeQiKz7B0jQa1sRF3t73tQXP9qR 2spK1bbUeNsQc3r515Grw0Uvfa7V4qyVqziEMx/Xwr6gP+Amfj25sUKvycI11uuyhgrx SvveQdOSWKrUlJ8xIL+dFmZDdrN8yHxdc9tg7CJyBm3LN6Vu/05/eOVTwgSuc7eaVyrf VZwQwlucs3dMcMpPKJV7lERFRQRHLmLtMcT/jpdkqxlehT0ysq2mEqPIaIM1B0yyvE0t /CNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q9si3333082oif.92.2020.03.05.06.00.00; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726234AbgCEN6X (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:58:23 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:36408 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725946AbgCEN6X (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:58:23 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 025DsGLM010806; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:58:19 -0500 Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yhryevqjy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 08:58:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 025Dq3dI024309; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:58:17 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2yffk6uh61-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:58:17 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 025DwH6j49545712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:58:17 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01653C6059; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:58:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BBDC6057; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:58:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:58:16 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] tpm: ibmvtpm: Add support for TPM2 To: Jarkko Sakkinen , Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcwilson@linux.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca References: <20200304132243.179402-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200304132243.179402-4-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Stefan Berger Message-ID: <8dcd22c1-b05f-d619-58c5-fd2248c75b9e@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:58:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-05_04:2020-03-05,2020-03-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003050090 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/5/20 6:21 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 08:22 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: >> From: Stefan Berger >> >> Support TPM2 in the IBM vTPM driver. The hypervisor tells us what >> version of TPM is connected through the vio_device_id. >> >> In case a TPM2 device is found, we set the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 flag >> and get the command codes attributes table. The driver does >> not need the timeouts and durations, though. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > There is huge bunch of people in the cc-list and these patches > have total zero tested-by's. Why is that? I cc'ed them because of their involvement in other layers. That's all I can say.   Stefan > > /Jarkko >