Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp5769369ybf; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 06:44:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtwqbYoSK0g5rXUn4Nf5ExllEVnwx/peOnbT2sxIp2rfimM20DLqM2Xa6RHWXTSIyfwIFWQ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6058:: with SMTP id v24mr6623200otj.115.1583419445008; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:44:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583419444; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AVIAZZ3vqqJOUJmv4+pKWZxAqc6uaVdlXL6mVfX0iROOhvnXm8NIE9OgRiC/UL7CsL YwUY3/IQKOGcWRQcXyrhyzjhV8/PgDrjExvofWTITUwmC8da1KzTGu0y9FRqSf8rm3Y0 l1l2Lv/g9rezeEa3wGWrsXJN1oIZziIV9Dyh3LnwSq9qjq4+/UiOsG2rq5pHGB42OhCO XyUmXU4sEkWI4A9ZzRkeZ6RieQPGVZpDp0tTttx6ogDk4t3YQ4Ks6Siw8ACs3UmQI0A/ oklxHnKMuBxCWyFwcSsBGjHAVBCJN/g/F2Xx3UfxZas4stnFTZPhHgQ19+C5Xp+nhBUX ispQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:content-id:mime-version :subject:cc:to:references:in-reply-to:from:organization :dkim-signature; bh=bwIzNESuUZFLv2swghASvgdJ5b2f9zf7o+dRg9fWt2Q=; b=RyaTYQQaYWywVFaOTPO58euVdQxba/WsvTfjMNRe76Il0RMYSP3/sUVLvnVgKK6mEc Kn1aLctOw4BS4COe5Dcupov4XC1kzlAk1ybM4qmmMzwg6HPjkNNfsX/nwiaOZZXEEMAA 1qrkXai896mO012wTp3Rb7PJtu7/N/XhYT3TDJGastRt0we0vcWNsBh1YnrrsjvLmDiP vTs2gOKqcq4vVSlpOX1P9vmFkpul/HOXYTUNWoj4aJUmUrjL5eHMrK904/kggyJyBfhm xqNTOfej/M6QZXmKf08abxsJ1IMH6hrNNr12ovxFFOPCbiGhphaAm93aOTZlTRWVDO31 W/VQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZxI6n2xF; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2si3286396ois.221.2020.03.05.06.43.52; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:44:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZxI6n2xF; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726263AbgCEOnb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:43:31 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:31330 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725944AbgCEOna (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:43:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583419409; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bwIzNESuUZFLv2swghASvgdJ5b2f9zf7o+dRg9fWt2Q=; b=ZxI6n2xFNg5FbfW8hwuLZvjIQ83Yeh+VPgKdf6hsTLm52v3w9EiRUlj38VtpSlyt01cblE N1ZdlgUSUpZWIMeI6SuP2BN+dmS68q1XFSgXDaG0WRJ6zk+JkOzHYRo5DYqRXvMB3noM8o Gy17XVpiJiE6wGP3cAs58B47w7TsuBA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-9-yurzBPoAPpWjd4sCFJb0bA-1; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:43:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yurzBPoAPpWjd4sCFJb0bA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E897B8048FE; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-120-182.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.182]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08869277B5; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <875zfi989k.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> References: <875zfi989k.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87y2sjlygl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <96563.1582901612@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20200228152427.rv3crd7akwdhta2r@wittgenstein> <87h7z7ngd4.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20200302115239.pcxvej3szmricxzu@wittgenstein> <8736arnel9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20200302121959.it3iophjavbhtoyp@wittgenstein> <20200302123510.bm3a2zssohwvkaa4@wittgenstein> <3606975.1583418833@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Florian Weimer Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christian Brauner , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, metze@samba.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, cyphar@cyphar.com, sfrench@samba.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3607682.1583419401.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:43:21 +0000 Message-ID: <3607683.1583419401@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Florian Weimer wrote: > But will those be O_ flags that need to be passed to openat? Ah, sorry, you were talking about openat(). I doubt there's sufficient O_* space for that. David