Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp5846121ybf; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:07:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv/CHOXda58rB9gn6Nr4GM7JTngEnxTIpJY0WtcOF1wxDI4ofnaW8DzgUKor3st+AgUDoLG X-Received: by 2002:aca:b60a:: with SMTP id g10mr5999553oif.102.1583424438222; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 08:07:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583424438; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a3Hl5BoP2S2zmAekJbiuBwdZ1rG4kNUdl565rHfbtIJOv3BIbvWU7Y4rS/PNMKF/y4 TCDDM1zE98zP6F4sdckBD4kOjgZRjWaHfnnZlVeKPWG+3JKgse3RdSzGddAFZFFgPsHq JFOr+uiO78wzUxlxGwTlzUgMMSTxcVEyzqVXsTgAgZ8KDe/peYW70GRzz0x3Lxlya8G5 /lchdYYmkvDZJ/0aOuzqSJwiKMzjoS//qbA0AoiEMGW09xinxJKYUXYO2ai909ELnKqF fPbDzLXNpd+nJVRG9frmMm26jdGFg+jm2kOdaChhCnbniTMWiljvcg6k+KeKCbnt96Si bqUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Oi322uvcrw7XKbmOI7qZdaSSD21dbrZcMQAUy44/Lhg=; b=Gl4lRZFjNt24AgR98IEZh0kfcKZ/MHPV0NuyqocOhBexHYgM+CRSj3FWPm04S19Uxo G0V5AIhx9DJcELUClZXxsFGvkjhNwMUd3nyPKcIzg1KHJG3J5suYwYu+uO53e8LYkmom rA+1km75am+e/Y4NEF3X8KOb1lY9PYVd4uUi/wJ1i+fwWp/rhpGxSSF0wFYF133k2pra gwh3GNCziVUB7ZlCto15wKk+asXk63NHhCilq0wjKBLKl7MaUj+rElhKOxmCSxktxBDr PBQi2swGGjhT0aDjV+VZYPFvg7Kly1exQOkfA3lwrAWvJVKWyFTrKA/ISCWeTGef/wUp iL+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h136si3667776oib.141.2020.03.05.08.07.04; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 08:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726209AbgCEQGV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:06:21 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:50682 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726007AbgCEQGV (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:06:21 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177C930E; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:06:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B31CF3F534; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:06:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:06:14 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , dl-linux-imx , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: add smc/hvc transport Message-ID: <20200305160613.GA53631@bogus> References: <1583201219-15839-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <1583201219-15839-3-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <20200304103954.GA25004@bogus> <20200304170319.GB44525@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:25:35AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: [...] > > > > Yes, this may fix the issue. However I would like to know if we need to support > > multiple channels/shared memory simultaneously. It is fair requirement and > > may need some work which should be fine. > > Do you have any suggestions? Currently I have not worked out an good > solution. > TBH, I haven't given it a much thought. I would like to know if people are happy with just one SMC channel for SCMI or do they need more ? If they need it, we can try to solve it. Otherwise, what you have will suffice IMO. -- Regards, Sudeep