Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200305050207.4159-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> <CAJ+HfNjrUxVqpBgC-WLHbZX7_7Gd-Lk7ghrmASTmaNySuXVUfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4633123d-dc61-ab79-d2ee-e0cef66e4cea@iogearbox.net>
In-Reply-To: <4633123d-dc61-ab79-d2ee-e0cef66e4cea@iogearbox.net>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:53:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNg_cP8DC+C0UGHnumde6+YhqBoTB909A9XwFMPv82tqWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/4] eBPF JIT for RV32G
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc:     Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:19, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>
[...]
> Applied, thanks everyone!
>
> P.s.: I fixed the MAINTAINERS entry in the last one to have both netdev and bpf
> to be consistent with all the other JIT entries there.

Ah, I asked specifically Xi and Luke to *remove* the netdev entry, due
to the bpf_devel_QA.rst change. :-)