Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945898AbWBOJIv (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:08:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423062AbWBOJIv (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:08:51 -0500 Received: from fmr23.intel.com ([143.183.121.15]:42400 "EHLO scsfmr003.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423060AbWBOJIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:08:49 -0500 Message-Id: <200602150908.k1F98dg02934@unix-os.sc.intel.com> From: "Chen, Kenneth W" To: , "Tony Luck" , "Andrew Morton" , , Cc: "Jack Steiner" , "Robin Holt" , "Dimitri Sivanich" , "Jes Sorensen" Subject: RE: [PATCH] ia64: simplify and fix udelay() Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:08:41 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcYxlpO36D6DTV3ZRR2ojOGsacUNFQAdePGQ In-Reply-To: <20060214184017.20492.48141.sendpatchset@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 16 hawkes@sgi.com wrote on Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:40 AM > a preemption and migration to another CPU during the > while-loop Off topic from the subject line a bit, but related: how many Altix SN2 customers in the field turn on CONFIG_PREEMPT? Redhat EL4 doesn't turn on preempt, SuSE SLES9 and SLES10 beta don't turn it on either. Is there a real benefit of turning that option on for SN2? - Ken - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/