Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] kvm: selftests: Add TEST_FAIL macro
To:     Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     shuah@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, thuth@redhat.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200305172532.9360-1-wainersm@redhat.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <e7bacea1-6964-aeb2-633e-371ad1231881@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 18:28:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200305172532.9360-1-wainersm@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 05/03/20 18:25, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> The following patch's commit message is self-explanatory about this proposal.
> 
> I adjusted to use TEST_FAIL only a few source files, in reality it will
> need to change all the ones listed below. I will proceed with the
> adjustments if this new macro idea is accepted.
> 
> $ find . -type f -name "*.c" -exec grep -l "TEST_ASSERT(false" {} \;
> ./lib/kvm_util.c
> ./lib/io.c
> ./lib/x86_64/processor.c
> ./lib/aarch64/ucall.c
> ./lib/aarch64/processor.c
> ./x86_64/vmx_dirty_log_test.c
> ./x86_64/state_test.c
> ./x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c
> ./x86_64/svm_vmcall_test.c
> ./x86_64/evmcs_test.c
> ./x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test.c
> 
> Wainer dos Santos Moschetta (1):
>   kvm: selftests: Add TEST_FAIL macro
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c             | 7 +++----
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h          | 3 +++
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Yes, why not.

Paolo