Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp6671733ybf; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 02:16:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vstbUgMXvBpB7DmhjQpGAs4629cEQRC++R/5NS7+6o6ixVtWaJXQZYh0E9TrcdIOoVGXJ9O X-Received: by 2002:aca:f38b:: with SMTP id r133mr1947803oih.43.1583489780693; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:16:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583489780; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AdHecPYKqCDyPJGnUYO8UOIWZSA5mKUHoG8t3sFoKyOX+sGGLti/jqbilJE9BNY9KS z6EfXXnMhQS5w+L8mnRxj1O8CQVO/n1olaginYCh3kcaJZSp2pZt1PZhEW0aee1FooIF D0kCkVvsA75VGiLKeJlt9hNrxgvSp2CFQcV3CHHI8KIGPYXa7MZZfas7pjx2KpGtuCoS COUQcSTMS264VZhr9/KUhlElt5zCzpUQJ+y7tUp6xZtnEhMn0rjQFfWsEV3CVF2ziCPc Quq/YkI0idH1UbNk4swHumOAHexmE7keLOVy0ci9+2af1q/AWHsIza3kOPfp55auWnav zcuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=JrMs07MY2g+UKb5EDRgE23qQsFrvwRFqTNqqEh89w9I=; b=knBHPGHMlt6zLhsNfDczE8yaOixUUn7rILPBO6oYMcKeetq1njnq5e53qvl1KmtMl5 hP3lZP0k+SnursFNW6EbB6ybqhFm7GMpzAK9uCLZHi3xfKUCQ4W5Sgl2h92OR0XCKTy3 DsRl1jR5ANOcopolkSbOV3+ewMF02vcCj4blqMK54OzvjYEBrIPKoIdw0L6qK8NQd604 UEx8SGe4ivd5nn7gxVU6nnhHOVFFHhi2aqXwBH6XCg5n6i4KMzXc2hTkRDsyU8f7H5KC 3M6oicWoX0K80kWlm61pmL7MFqDw1MqIR20OaOjPyytLz5oi2Me2GzzJNw9vvlPpjWBk bcVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=lSMfLZUT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h9si1006927oti.155.2020.03.06.02.16.07; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=lSMfLZUT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726740AbgCFKO4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 05:14:56 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50826 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726359AbgCFKOz (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 05:14:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com (mail-wm1-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD8A9208C3 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:14:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583489695; bh=JrMs07MY2g+UKb5EDRgE23qQsFrvwRFqTNqqEh89w9I=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=lSMfLZUTVY1802PpPFgv/mrHFXEMdr9bTh5ARukXUmNoOMNpSrVrzLwl48tTycssb smNV3y2Uxtb4dqGRDGtUlT45KCkP7kBaeqEAdRVVEVUX32DJv+Etgpq6sT7MvJYMra t3TQlgWX94UvmNkC2YtkNZ0gwR0XZEN151/r3QYc= Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id e26so1721079wme.5 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:14:54 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0KD9+jb1TnJudPBY1VPdpp1XUG+VuzKG9WyEJwyE12wE4/VCm0 3wFzGgcaNdRbuIoZt9CZBGKrcbRf8y/nTHxNuN91bA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9d43:: with SMTP id g64mr3184759wme.62.1583489692927; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:14:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181124162123.21300-1-n.merinov@inango-systems.com> <20191224092119.4581-1-n.merinov@inango-systems.com> <20200108133926.GC4455@infradead.org> <26f7bd89f212f68b03a4b207e96d8702c9049015.1578910723.git.n.merinov@inango-systems.com> <20200218185336.GA14242@infradead.org> <797777312.1324734.1582544319435.JavaMail.zimbra@inango-systems.com> <20200224170813.GA27403@infradead.org> <711479725.2305.1583484191776.JavaMail.zimbra@inango-systems.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:14:41 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] partitions/efi: Fix partition name parsing in GUID partition entry To: Nikolai Merinov Cc: hch , Davidlohr Bueso , Jens Axboe , linux-efi , linux-block , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 10:25, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 09:43, Nikolai Merinov > wrote: > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > Should I perform any other steps in order to get this change in the master? > > > > I can take it via the EFI tree with an ack from Dave. > ... or actually, I'm sure Dave is fine with it, so I'll just queue it in efi/next directly (with Christoph's ack) > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "hch" > > > To: "n merinov" > > > Cc: "hch" , "Davidlohr Bueso" , "Jens Axboe" , "Ard Biesheuvel" > > > , "linux-efi" , "linux-block" , "linux-kernel" > > > > > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 10:08:13 PM > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] partitions/efi: Fix partition name parsing in GUID partition entry > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Nikolai Merinov wrote: > > >> Hi Christoph, > > >> > > >> > I'd rather use plain __le16 and le16_to_cpu here. Also the be > > >> > variants seems to be entirely unused. > > >> > > >> Looks like I misunderstood your comment from > > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11309223/: > > >> > > >> > Please add a an efi_char_from_cpu or similarly named helper > > >> > to encapsulate this logic. > > >> > > >> The "le16_to_cpu(ptes[i].partition_name[label_count])" call is the > > >> full implementation of the "efi_char_from_cpu" logic. Do you want > > >> to encapsulate "utf16_le_to_7bit_string" logic entirely like in > > >> the attached version? > > > > > > I think I though of just the inner loop, but your new version looks even > > > better, so: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig