Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945999AbWBOQAi (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:00:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946002AbWBOQAi (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:00:38 -0500 Received: from solarneutrino.net ([66.199.224.43]:16905 "EHLO tau.solarneutrino.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945999AbWBOQAi (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:00:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:00:36 -0500 To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Erik Mouw , Nick Warne Subject: Re: Random reboots Message-ID: <20060215160036.GB17864@tau.solarneutrino.net> References: <20060215142809.GA17842@tau.solarneutrino.net> <6cBigqfP.1140018099.7722170.khali@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6cBigqfP.1140018099.7722170.khali@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Ryan Richter Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3414 Lines: 74 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:41:39PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > > On 2006-02-15, Ryan Richter wrote: > > The sensors report a bunch of obvious nonsesne as always... I keep them > > configured in with the hope that one day they'll report useful > > information, but that day hasn't come yet. I just checked, and all the > > fans are still fine. It's in a huge case with lots of fans and it's > > hardly warmer than room temp. The opteron 240s don't put out much heat. > > The sensors might just need some board-specific configuration. May I ask > which motherboard this is? > > I may help you (in private) setup your sensors. If you're interested, > send the output of "sensors-detect" and "sensors" to me and I'll > see what can be done to improve the reported values. It's a Tyan S2880, and I'm using their sensors.conf: ftp://ftp.tyan.com/software/lms/lms_s2880.tgz Here's what sensors reports: w83627hf-isa-0290 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.54 V (min = +1.47 V, max = +1.62 V) ALARM VCore 2: +1.54 V (min = +1.47 V, max = +1.62 V) ALARM +3.3V: +3.33 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.46 V) +5V: +4.97 V (min = +4.73 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +4.56 V (min = +10.82 V, max = +13.19 V) -12V: -2.25 V (min = -13.18 V, max = -10.88 V) -5V: -3.94 V (min = -5.25 V, max = -4.75 V) V5SB: +5.51 V (min = +4.73 V, max = +5.24 V) VBat: +1.28 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +3.60 V) fan1: 4354 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2) fan2: 3479 RPM (min = 5273 RPM, div = 2) fan3: 0 RPM (min = 30681 RPM, div = 2) temp1: +77°C (high = -128°C, hyst = -128°C) sensor = thermistor temp2: +77.5°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor temp3: +77.5°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor vid: +1.550 V (VRM Version 2.4) The temps and +/-12V readings are obviously wrong, and always have been AFAIR. I've run the machine with 6 more 10krpm old full-height drives than it currently has. I checked the max 5V and 12V current draw of the drives and specced the power supply carefully when we bought it a couple years ago, and it has lots of headroom on both of those rails. > Two more random thoughts: > > Any reason why you run 2.6.15 rather than 2.6.15.4? That's where I would > start if I was suspecting a kernel bug. > > Did you already update the BIOS to the latest version available? There > are a few kernel complaints in your dmesg which might be solved by a > newer BIOS (and/or parameter changes in the BIOS setup). I'll be booting 2.6.15.4 this weekend. The BIOS is indeed old, and I see there's a newer one that came out a year ago. It'll be a while before I can try it, I need to scare up a keyboard, video card, and monitor, not to mention a DOS disk. You can tell why I haven't flashed the BIOS in years... Still, I don't see why the new kernel shouldn't be stable if 2.6.11.3 was. Thanks, -ryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/