Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp6742071ybf; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 03:43:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtWeuIX/AUk16ythgqzNmNIw+pEoFUSVW40DBUptAeKkx2CqNVLwbOvOIs5qb7QUcPwsGyH X-Received: by 2002:aca:3354:: with SMTP id z81mr2302553oiz.129.1583494990285; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 03:43:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583494990; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Cc2Bu3kgBxi9jVBeV+WYNZ+HPK2kvfvXiZKq6z2mKMBFjLMVtf3KSHJbiXtj37gyyf BvDVRTCbLFnuz9vH3rNOwdvI3I8u9fSXVN5HaJ73nGnDXXs7nUMpf6DqTm0uoxv4GovF BxL8fn/ADMkhwvsDdea4gh/Eo5/BFT4B3+OpM0cvvmLCwevrkKjbpUdpDDk1uq4b8YPf Yl2Ynpdbg3E6LXKxLJXoQx6sYzq1uAA2b8HfpRBmabqkGDAOqc4cXpUOfAxxepLGT7Sp JTnQdtPWNX6z4GaMe0IZynaj8JTcokYbi/Bg3NngI4k/CsWHZ8+AIL/2d3VJpsdIxXi9 L+gQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :references:subject:cc:to:from; bh=KIkZog3lN78Tr9Gqe8OGJ5YtQZlxZwunuxWoX2K+aHI=; b=JyoIK9Rs2OLplnCora783KdzYBgy4Yh2AZ35CpLbKSMQynVfKkIKZSVZ1UDWuIhpUP 52gY2JFrEIziruJdufbedujXp/Oawj+ZrXZhByNswg4vMgQbQambzifVSAXuEbAkNUjU EWjvvBse3KxFwee8upPCScAceuxxuSYbKRfKbglr4VvPiUjHLkisCubsX9ycZRB3N0N/ 6zlX2jU4OyXLzo/3gWTd6xg8DJLYEH5umcTuGGjV++O3bJgXm2zhRUPBAdFlQ/5y8XUf aYmhU9gJYjBJFNcd40BpOvpStV1Qrp2kMcOlvU494jJ/2tmi/kal7MYEA1+nnBQW3US5 WAIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si1083100oiq.71.2020.03.06.03.42.58; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 03:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726413AbgCFLm1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 06:42:27 -0500 Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([37.24.231.21]:57960 "EHLO albireo.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725827AbgCFLm0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 06:42:26 -0500 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jABMw-00028i-VZ; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:42:18 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jABLL-00050q-TL; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:40:39 +0100 From: Florian Weimer To: YunQiang Su Cc: Laurent Vivier , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Greg KH , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter References: <20200306080905.173466-1-syq@debian.org> <87r1y53npd.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <8441f497-61eb-5c14-bf1e-c90a464105a7@vivier.eu> <87mu8t3mlw.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <40da389d-4e74-2644-2e7c-04d988fcc26f@vivier.eu> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:40:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: (YunQiang Su's message of "Fri, 6 Mar 2020 19:29:57 +0800") Message-ID: <87v9nhzp6w.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * YunQiang Su: > AT_* only has 32 slot and now. I was afraid that maybe we shouldn't take one. > /* AT_* values 18 through 22 are reserved */ > 27,28,29,30 are not used now. > Which should we use? Where does this limit of 32 tags come from? I don't see it from a userspace perspective.