Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946007AbWBOQbD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:31:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946010AbWBOQbD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:31:03 -0500 Received: from solarneutrino.net ([66.199.224.43]:18441 "EHLO tau.solarneutrino.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946007AbWBOQbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:31:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:30:58 -0500 To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Erik Mouw , Nick Warne Subject: Re: Random reboots Message-ID: <20060215163058.GC17864@tau.solarneutrino.net> References: <20060215160036.GB17864@tau.solarneutrino.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Ryan Richter Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1694 Lines: 40 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:20:37PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > There's one chip missing. If memory serves, this board has two hardware > monitoring chips: one Winbond Super-I/O and one LM85-compatible SMBus > chip. You are missing the i2c-amd756 driver in your kernel build > (CONFIG_I2C_AMD756) which prevents you from accessing that second chip. > > Additionally, the Winbond Super-I/O chips are better supported by the > newer w83627hf driver than by the w83781d you are using. > > So, you should change your kernel configuration to: > > CONFIG_I2C_AMD756=y > #CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D is not set > CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627HF=y > > Then you'll probably have much better results - even if the > configuration file might need additional tweaking. Aha, thanks. I probably configured out the AMD756 when we switched to this board from an actual AMD 7xx board, thinking it was no longer appropriate. I'll make the change this weekend. > > Still, I don't see why the new kernel shouldn't be stable if 2.6.11.3 > > was. > > If not software regression, the aging of your hardware might have caused > it, as I mentioned earlier. But you are free to believe in the > hypothesis you prefer, given that we are not currently able to > demonstrate it anyway ;) It could certainly be hardware, but it seems awfully unlikely that that would occur exactly when I upgraded the kernel. A kernel bug just seems the most parsimonious explanation, to me. -ryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/