Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200306124705.6595-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20200306124823.38C2A80307C4@mail.baikalelectronics.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20200306124823.38C2A80307C4@mail.baikalelectronics.ru>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:56:51 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLSC818+vxgn7Yk0XOAk=NC057VGsFCBt-H65DDkc1W6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: Permit platform devices in the
 trivial-devices bindings
To:     Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:48 AM <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote:
>
> From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
>
> Indeed there are a log of trivial devices amongst platform controllers,
> IP-blocks, etc. If they satisfy the trivial devices bindings requirements
> like consisting of a compatible field, an address and possibly an interrupt
> line why not having them in the generic trivial-devices bindings file?

NAK.

Do you have some documentation on what a platform bus is? Last I
checked, that's a Linux thing.

If anything, we'd move toward getting rid of trivial-devices.yaml. For
example, I'd like to start defining the node name which wouldn't work
for trivial-devices.yaml unless we split by class.

Rob