Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp910621ybh; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 13:44:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs78qbB3viXrlekFICJqIAxgq3qfWnvQdvvs4+dwEaTg9qS1HSUBSuQ29oWBWPE7A9U+F4b X-Received: by 2002:aca:ea46:: with SMTP id i67mr6713012oih.149.1583617473495; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:44:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583617473; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Aqu2XkHNS3MX8GvyEO769+rB7nkOZH+j/Nkb/bWHykgQRQbpyGpHhhkqLUIrJnGVOi UZxU3o+9HsuC23CudsjeWePdF1kRBSzbeFYE/GPZ6GKMuXQuMjWJzVK0WXIH+y1PZd6o l9J/YAMg2MzTCLmc78elCSCRvVXqJevOFAWXt36bHGZf+zsIs8UuJqLR+JNe2LaD+5Sc q4ro7nNt88b+LH8de961BUdIBLswscec9lhGI4+jSLUWF/uqmzoaMsIAnhq1QeMMEwKj AbCW1hnf/pQO+MsDfqTOYsRlUcp1aemytMCOuQ+qHpNQGzSe0ewvmIaHKgSABcBovoum ft2Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=hR2spyfwuRBKJywM8p77o46CUCdjWuwwuSzoSlSSXZc=; b=hxxWFFvReELpoidVeCYqFOXgkKGHVy5gOsOlgI+ExPbeHAQX4ZtSjz/oqwp3gj+9at xKM7ymTuhzofctU4IkG/Rw6FidntSsWwUTQhX0ULmdS11JKc+l7hNIMxsywUCelyr++s 9QQqazitQorM/Kkuq3cnkNlxRmctvPE6tDdjEv+8JFndlSDLOeX72GJV55xPU4kgpL3l jeWicSPUMUv8MEiKQduEaazLk48ry11YUL+zjLmj9J4J7n9QydiVlvtyXg7ZZZP87sNK mPb4pwRUADouebIjIqYh68T+zCR6X1TxgUBcUTGLLMQMHIdyweY+T9oXLUHe5DpYWd9i UOkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="Xh/hOuKO"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e6si1636061oig.223.2020.03.07.13.44.08; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="Xh/hOuKO"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726225AbgCGVnO (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:43:14 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36212 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725911AbgCGVnN (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:43:13 -0500 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-107-3-166-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [107.3.166.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D6FD20684; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 21:43:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583617392; bh=EuZ8FGAG/nlMwc0huc4bMVpwKK827PeKRrSlxik5lsA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xh/hOuKOvQI3hjau5VbTwhsjvZSv6Y/ZHJb3HSn9OtZiOjjWP2/4XAnCaqWr/Xw/N 1VMYhb7B7VWmE0ATg79iR64VUbtGCi7M50/ZxK+l3TrkyW92eqB17WvJfqbW+q9JX9 kMFqAFTsjDlwXnJJ26lsZzsBDPK9cJpAzrDQDaw0= Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 13:43:10 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Cc: syzbot , akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [ashmem] possible deadlock in shmem_fallocate (4) Message-ID: <20200307214310.GP15444@sol.localdomain> References: <0000000000000b5f9d059aa2037f@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0000000000000b5f9d059aa2037f@google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ashmem is calling shmem_fallocate() during memory reclaim, which can deadlock on inode_lock(). +Cc maintainers of drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c. On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 01:25:09PM -0800, syzbot wrote: > Hello, > > syzbot found the following crash on: > > HEAD commit: 46cf053e Linux 5.5-rc3 > git tree: upstream > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=162124aee00000 > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ed9d672709340e35 > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7a0d9d0b26efefe61780 > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental) > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet. > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit: > Reported-by: syzbot+7a0d9d0b26efefe61780@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > kswapd0/1852 is trying to acquire lock: > ffff888098919cd8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}, at: inode_lock > include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline] > ffff888098919cd8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}, at: > shmem_fallocate+0x15a/0xd40 mm/shmem.c:2735 > > but task is already holding lock: > ffffffff89a41e00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 > mm/page_alloc.c:4922 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: > __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:4084 [inline] > fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x24/0x30 mm/page_alloc.c:4095 > fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:4695 [inline] > prepare_alloc_pages mm/page_alloc.c:4692 [inline] > __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x52d/0x910 mm/page_alloc.c:4744 > alloc_pages_vma+0xdd/0x620 mm/mempolicy.c:2170 > shmem_alloc_page+0xc0/0x180 mm/shmem.c:1499 > shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x165/0x990 mm/shmem.c:1524 > shmem_getpage_gfp+0x56d/0x29a0 mm/shmem.c:1838 > shmem_getpage mm/shmem.c:154 [inline] > shmem_write_begin+0x105/0x1e0 mm/shmem.c:2487 > generic_perform_write+0x23b/0x540 mm/filemap.c:3309 > __generic_file_write_iter+0x25e/0x630 mm/filemap.c:3438 > generic_file_write_iter+0x420/0x68e mm/filemap.c:3470 > call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1902 [inline] > new_sync_write+0x4d3/0x770 fs/read_write.c:483 > __vfs_write+0xe1/0x110 fs/read_write.c:496 > vfs_write+0x268/0x5d0 fs/read_write.c:558 > ksys_write+0x14f/0x290 fs/read_write.c:611 > __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:623 [inline] > __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:620 [inline] > __x64_sys_write+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:620 > do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > > -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}: > check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline] > check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline] > validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline] > __lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955 > lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485 > down_write+0x93/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1534 > inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline] > shmem_fallocate+0x15a/0xd40 mm/shmem.c:2735 > ashmem_shrink_scan drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:462 [inline] > ashmem_shrink_scan+0x370/0x510 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:437 > do_shrink_slab+0x40f/0xad0 mm/vmscan.c:526 > shrink_slab mm/vmscan.c:687 [inline] > shrink_slab+0x19a/0x680 mm/vmscan.c:660 > shrink_node_memcgs mm/vmscan.c:2687 [inline] > shrink_node+0x46a/0x1ad0 mm/vmscan.c:2791 > kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:3539 [inline] > balance_pgdat+0x7c8/0x11f0 mm/vmscan.c:3697 > kswapd+0x5c3/0xf30 mm/vmscan.c:3948 > kthread+0x361/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:255 > ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352 > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(fs_reclaim); > lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13); > lock(fs_reclaim); > lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 2 locks held by kswapd0/1852: > #0: ffffffff89a41e00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 > mm/page_alloc.c:4922 > #1: ffffffff89a1f948 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab > mm/vmscan.c:677 [inline] > #1: ffffffff89a1f948 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0xe6/0x680 > mm/vmscan.c:660 > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 0 PID: 1852 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS > Google 01/01/2011 > Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] > dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118 > print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x163/0x172 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1685 > check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1809 > check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2476 [inline] > check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2581 [inline] > validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2971 [inline] > __lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3955 > lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4485 > down_write+0x93/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1534 > inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline] > shmem_fallocate+0x15a/0xd40 mm/shmem.c:2735 > ashmem_shrink_scan drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:462 [inline] > ashmem_shrink_scan+0x370/0x510 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:437 > do_shrink_slab+0x40f/0xad0 mm/vmscan.c:526 > shrink_slab mm/vmscan.c:687 [inline] > shrink_slab+0x19a/0x680 mm/vmscan.c:660 > shrink_node_memcgs mm/vmscan.c:2687 [inline] > shrink_node+0x46a/0x1ad0 mm/vmscan.c:2791 > kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:3539 [inline] > balance_pgdat+0x7c8/0x11f0 mm/vmscan.c:3697 > kswapd+0x5c3/0xf30 mm/vmscan.c:3948 > kthread+0x361/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:255 > ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352 > > > --- > This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. > > syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See: > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > > --