Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932490AbWBPFrA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:47:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932488AbWBPFrA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:47:00 -0500 Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.151]:34686 "EHLO mtagate2.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932490AbWBPFq7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:46:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:46:44 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Andrew Morton Cc: carsteno@de.ibm.com, cotte@de.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, horst.hummel@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, heicars2@de.ibm.com, wein@de.ibm.com, mschwid2@de.ibm.com, ihno@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] new dasd ioctl patchkit Message-ID: <20060216054644.GA9241@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <1139935988.6183.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060214190909.GA20527@lst.de> <43F3397B.3090207@de.ibm.com> <20060215120343.1e4e8afe.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060215120343.1e4e8afe.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r781 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1375 Lines: 33 > > > As long as we backout the bogus eer > > > patch before 2.6.16 all the cleanups and even the eckd ioctl fix > > > can wait. But don't put this crappy interface into 1.6.16 and thus > > > SLES10 so that applications start to rely on it. > > ACK: Given that a) both Horst and Christoph think the ioctl interface > > needs cleanup but proposed cleanup interfers with existing > > functionality (cmb), and b) later cleanup would change the > > user-interface of eer, we should rush neither the ioctl change nor > > eer into .16 until the maintainer is back afaics. > > > > I don't have a patch in hand to purely back out the eer modeule. What I > have is > > dasd-cleanup-dasd_ioctl.patch > dasd-cleanup-dasd_ioctl-fix.patch > dasd-add-per-disciple-ioctl-method.patch > dasd-merge-dasd_cmd-into-dasd_mod.patch > dasd-backout-dasd_eer-module.patch > dasd-kill-dynamic-ioctl-registration.patch > > So what do we do? Looks like people still haven't agreed. If they _finally_ agree on something and the result is that the eer should be backed out, I will send that patch. Sorry... I'm just the stupid patch monkey here. Heiko - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/