Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:15:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:15:48 -0400 Received: from [208.129.208.52] ([208.129.208.52]:13580 "EHLO xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:15:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:22:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: "David E. Weekly" cc: ML-linux-kernel Subject: Re: Kernel Compile in tmpfs crumples in 2.4.12 w/epoll patch In-Reply-To: <016a01c15831$ef51c5c0$5c044589@legato.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, David E. Weekly wrote: > Hey all, > > I was trying to speed up kernel compiles experimentally by moving the source > tree into tmpfs and compiling there. It seemed to work okay and crunched > through the dep phase and most of the main build phase just fine, but then > it hit a file, got an internal segfault, and stopped. I tried again -- this > time make itself segfaulted. Three more times of make segfaulting -- a > strace on make didn't reveal what was failing. Then strace started > segfaulting. Eventually "ls" segfaulted and the machine needed to be > manually rebooted. Ouch! > > I ran the full memtest86 suite on the machine, and it passed with flying > colors. So the memory proper is okay. > > I come to one of two conclusions: this is a wierd problem with my north > bridge, or there's something funky going on with tmpfs. > > Is tmpfs stable? Or, is /dev/epoll stable ? :) I'm running it both on UP and 2 way SMP w/o problems from July. Just try w/o /dev/epoll - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/