Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp2418599ybh; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 05:34:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuNK/73HJ+SfEfAVRV0bCoJFSeSsCOFLSjoC3rB7H3ldGrgYccATyuWlM0ocVyJ03QLxaLg X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:19e2:: with SMTP id t2mr5321760ott.97.1583757270577; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 05:34:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583757270; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WHc0xCGQ8DWDol4SPgBs1SPTS5g6lOOQ4vM0FTdzcDrwVGE1qJ4oae4/tnU3Y1GwUM 70biOOe7wfsR9gXe9kbddCgX27YiH/zdy6iyQrZ5MF3ZQOA6KnNAXZXOcZd95kWgXCkX Df/tzmLwqPnkZQaKrnQoo72tbHV5u+Txi9mZOU72LvA/ji4ZH0aAIv7Ky/QzPw6ahoiF ThR+wDMEpF31eAD95ADt/bmDtOMVuwFUcyDBkdVzLr/2VivEeemBNe507uT5KlX/tDBm h0IU6usqk0B1PjUhGaZEuPMoswJYj0q9YyQ8XxOLfG1+yx/TPmK0ZqJ0D6Hsjg4MLIXq eVrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=0ALzOMXybuMEWTAwwnTslND2G4NtU8+ceyQACiER+sc=; b=jU/sLtoKIqQFa4m4h2RaO7KJj29GAOj0TiWSrQm6qs5iMyWhujfs5O3rIqbtOkSeWr c7sngdKvSwU6zCIpjX3xWRhMcJJrdWc4wkff6NmDOgsJR0WqMKHu0ZBSNJ90AL17eI3A hmsgxgkeXvAtSMnVSlVDrx+39YAjsP3CldCUIRnxVTMxBzhPMWTR1Q7pWhj+SlwbkXWr CuOwqOrtAHgp8J7EMlo1XFD030pvjtknTkvgybibGByM+h06r1RPjdAXr9oFgi/2yltj Q3jjkgfhGY5cNovworzCpAKQoe4iVzrT2H92H9/CcvTf5PKmJxNWKeD3IPttB5rEv3C+ uhFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u14si6030614otg.10.2020.03.09.05.34.18; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 05:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726480AbgCIMdu (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:33:50 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2525 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726368AbgCIMdt (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:33:49 -0400 Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 77A01C586794C001E969; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:33:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:33:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (10.202.226.57) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:33:47 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:33:46 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Cristian Marussi CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] SCMI Notifications Core Support Message-ID: <20200309123346.00007dfb@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200304162558.48836-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20200304162558.48836-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.57] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.55) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:25:45 +0000 Cristian Marussi wrote: > Hi all, > > this series wants to introduce SCMI Notification Support, built on top of > the standard Kernel notification chain subsystem. > > At initialization time each SCMI Protocol takes care to register with the > new SCMI notification core the set of its own events which it intends to > support. > > Using the API exposed via scmi_handle.notify_ops a Kernel user can register > its own notifier_t callback (via a notifier_block as usual) against any > registered event as identified by the tuple: > > (proto_id, event_id, src_id) > > where src_id represents a generic source identifier which is protocol > dependent like domain_id, performance_id, sensor_id and so forth. > (users can anyway do NOT provide any src_id, and subscribe instead to ALL > the existing (if any) src_id sources for that proto_id/evt_id combination) > > Each of the above tuple-specified event will be served on its own dedicated > blocking notification chain, dynamically allocated on-demand when at least > one user has shown interest on that event. > > Upon a notification delivery all the users' registered notifier_t callbacks > will be in turn invoked and fed with the event_id as @action param and a > generated custom per-event struct _report as @data param. > (as in include/linux/scmi_protocol.h) > > The final step of notification delivery via users' callback invocation is > instead delegated to a pool of deferred workers (Kernel cmwq): each > SCMI protocol has its own dedicated worker and dedicated queue to push > events from the rx ISR to the worker. > > Based on scmi-next 5.6 [1], on top of: > > commit 5c8a47a5a91d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of > the transport type") > > This series has been tested on JUNO with an experimental firmware only > supporting Perf Notifications. I've looked through all the patches. A few of the comments go across multiple patches, but once resolved feel free to add. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron to the ones I haven't specifically commented on. Thanks, Jonathan > > Thanks > > Cristian > ---- > > v3 --> v4: > - dropped RFC tag > - avoid one unneeded evt payload memcpy on the ISR RC code path by > redesigning dispatcher to handle partial queue-reads (in_flight events, > only header) > - fixed the initialization issue exposed by late SCMI modules loading by > reviewing the init process to support possible late events registrations > by protocols and early callbacks registrations by users (pending) > - cleanup/simplification of exit path: SCMI protocols are generally never > de-initialized after the initial device creation, so do not deinit > notification core either (we do halt the delivery, stop the wq and empty > the queues though) > - reduced contention on regustered_events_handler to the minimum during > delivery by splitting the common registered_events_handlers hashtable > into a number of per-protocol tables > - converted registered_protocols and registered_events hastable to > fixed size arrays: simpler and lockless in our usage scenario > > v2 --> v3: > - added platform instance awareness to the notification core: a > notification instance is created for each known handle > - reviewed notification core initialization and shutdown process > - removed generic non-handle-rooted registration API > - added WQ_SYSFS flag to workqueue instance > > v1 --> v2: > - dropped anti-tampering patch > - rebased on top of scmi-for-next-5.6, which includes Viresh series that > make SCMI core independent of transport (5c8a47a5a91d) > - add a few new SCMI transport methods on top of Viresh patch to address > needs of SCMI Notifications > - reviewed/renamed scmi_handle_xfer_delayed_resp() > - split main SCMI Notification core patch (~1k lines) into three chunks: > protocol-registration / callbacks-registration / dispatch-and-delivery > - removed awkward usage of IDR maps in favour of pure hashtables > - added enable/disable refcounting in notification core (was broken in v1) > - removed per-protocol candidate API: a single generic API is now proposed > instead of scmi_register__event_notifier(evt_id, *src_id, *nb) > - added handle->notify_ops as an alternative notification API > for scmi_driver > - moved ALL_SRCIDs enabled handling from protocol code to core code > - reviewed protocol registration/unregistration logic to use devres > - reviewed cleanup phase on shutdown > - fixed ERROR: reference preceded by free as reported by kbuild test robot > > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git > > > Cristian Marussi (10): > firmware: arm_scmi: Add notifications support in transport layer > firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration > firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration > firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery > firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core > firmware: arm_scmi: Add Power notifications support > firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf notifications support > firmware: arm_scmi: Add Sensor notifications support > firmware: arm_scmi: Add Reset notifications support > firmware: arm_scmi: Add Base notifications support > > Sudeep Holla (3): > firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications > firmware: arm_scmi: Update protocol commands and notification list > firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 116 +++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 12 + > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 118 ++- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c | 17 + > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c | 1471 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.h | 78 ++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 135 +++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c | 129 +++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c | 96 ++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 73 ++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c | 15 + > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 110 ++ > 13 files changed, 2345 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.h >