Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp2453611ybh; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:15:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu6w2q8+k9/T9jYSyvIoNo6lZa/IH7idcHIxZSA2PTL4peDydFr5JxCnDdyELNs9VgNUIki X-Received: by 2002:aca:4fcc:: with SMTP id d195mr1751278oib.99.1583759739711; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 06:15:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583759739; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G+h6W1QehnCr6XBUgdVPSP8KwEf9ohPC4HxpMaQ+8GJ8s9OohOdaEBaDoJMw8t/cvC zIYqzRFfdtzJg01g7Sz3spAhSN4WpRTvijiU4AhIXKekpF5jN3vFmlv4XJUu5zn0RB6d ByAil6as/fpMTLuFSpOCanflOzUXlXd1UHf1BDIMgo+h+opwIYSgIikCvtmDzWFH30J4 Uvcn2oVZgZI2toU13QUY0GP31iGo7Oa6v6Qg1Cn9EKbvs6z8dKPyD/0gZLL1CSiEH6l6 GAG7EHZWhujVUnJ7oTldrwVPhz1DIvE+Kp8El0JdP2ZKUVHWXSB6VmJNQzMmkk01w9O8 UKUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=fAoWbqxR0uX+WwNZbsFheKTjGisZyWFxsv/0PhKeWZg=; b=lH+QbrkOSaiAAwPh2ucL5EvuvOGDsz0ay4QWK1k7B/jMZ81yWojW8gm8aSEfscU1jM i+/2zDm8ycTXv/FrvFzjaUkNXDSZCVP2pHFtmfTexvhgRSvKeQhF5VH4G3SDf10jkxO3 k7kWdm9Uyu5Jm2WCxeeEJ9RDTrMtgcMEqgurY2qFnLWs/zltfPlYkQVKD3dJFYcuFIxH UJwXV/YloRgE3OIilCdfTm4oXHNkCqjO821l1/Khd2AeSJ1iBM7+4GE90DmxzuwlQxwS N0NRqIRqNUqS4Mtb1l8TmXagIP3Y2bXjmMzsz5HH9hLBH4kyQmkCyAyjoFymPjNh7+hj UfHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11si2524355otg.171.2020.03.09.06.15.26; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 06:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726521AbgCINOM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:14:12 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:33165 "EHLO relay11.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725956AbgCINOM (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:14:12 -0400 Received: from xps13 (lfbn-tou-1-1473-158.w90-89.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.89.41.158]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C204100007; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:14:03 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: Mason Yang Cc: richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, tglx@linutronix.de, stefan@agner.ch, juliensu@mxic.com.tw, allison@lohutok.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bbrezillon@kernel.org, rfontana@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, yuehaibing@huawei.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Portection & Deep Power Down mode Message-ID: <20200309141403.241e773e@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1583220084-10890-1-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> References: <1583220084-10890-1-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mason, Mason Yang wrote on Tue, 3 Mar 2020 15:21:20 +0800: > Hi, > > Changelog > > v3: > patch nand_lock_area/nand_unlock_area. > fixed kbuidtest robot warnings and reviewer's comments. I know it is painful for the contributor but I really need more details in the changelog. This is something I care about because I can speed-up my reviews when I know what I already acked or not. "fixing reviewer's comments" is way too vague, I have absolutely no idea of what I told you last time :) So please, for the next iterations, be more verbose in these changelogs! (that's fine for this one, I'll check myself). Cheers, Miquèl