Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:46:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:46:09 -0400 Received: from otter.mbay.net ([206.40.79.2]:18956 "EHLO otter.mbay.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:45:54 -0400 From: John Alvord To: David Lang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MODULE_LICENSE and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:46:18 -0700 Message-ID: <9ttustkpmhc24c6q53bv5jghl3g257htdp@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <20011018180705.B13661@lug-owl.de> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:38:36 -0700 (PDT), David Lang wrote: >so what will the export_symbol_gpl stuff do with the BSD license? it may >or may not have source avilable so is it allowed to use the exported >symbols or not? > >for the tainting module process there is the same problem. > >knowing the license the code was released under does not tell you if the >source is available or not. Linus said that all existing entry points would remain untagged. Thus existing modules would not be affected. john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/