Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp2797141ybh; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:14:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuy0QQNthkP8Miqekhe6emIXrX06hvwpxGR76bWjU06qmwLvctFr/Ie0pO573hXrVzkJ+pF X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f86:: with SMTP id h6mr13595186otq.309.1583784854984; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583784854; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SV8cQe7HrcCegkpju2RRFxyIK53RSxf+12yLX/7tD4oDnGhb+yoKolJTyu36nuo4V0 e2v6pfy4UaZYwhfgoidM5aFs7rLMXTVdzT1IAsH9PMlmRSsGMRkJl0L9ozqXONzvhkRd a8W8QsoXGemJqhxzyBRty/JrxFxj4cxBY5P4iDO7jb9iK/Tv3HbhZx3l8IPEWbqOcbfs wBe7VQmZAl8HISemO6EarXZJWFjMr6lW5pOAQ8KIeyXP7K48Dx9q8T4b5tyjdPL05xpw QrkIRxDQZrox5DkXrZUbwS+IMZbvkgY/cQZx1GM5e4d/T6A+Re+35mO9p79xlUoTuLcW yyLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=KmqedJfTGCZh203ZdeJcZITO4jztD+EczqOL/0gU8IM=; b=AEM/X7YFPo6vsRqYhBWWaeY4C36wNDPKXj7MhM/eiQcyOZcph696nyAu62lXhP6Ikb TgEe5GHTdYtMKFmnw9DgD4rZUT2PAyE9jW5zJP6wl3rbJMccDLx6aco/TwY8Yi1X9CHI SPc4Pm/AwC9v66GJF90fi/TGer1mzwy9UBGkiw+2gds1Hsk0PLHKq7+T1YBaCX24Gv6N FsaI9kPVdMCVXwgJLBRofe7bz5oaTvU8X9qyfN9GQXtyCD/Kohx+Zq74zU9324nNKqji MPP4tnt8KFYEmJS5DoGkbStHFHtj8OXYtiG1Atdjnvf0rpa43iUgq3EFJVTtzFWSMNTo KcjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m7si4548810oie.138.2020.03.09.13.14.01; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726450AbgCIULf (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:11:35 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:39979 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726157AbgCIULf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:11:35 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2020 13:11:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,534,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="245452962" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.202]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2020 13:11:34 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:11:34 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/66] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM cpu caps Message-ID: <20200309201134.GA10653@linux.intel.com> References: <20200302235709.27467-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:27:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I put the complete series on the cpu-caps branch of kvm.git. Looks good, arrived at more or less the same end result when rebasing my local branch to kvm/queue. CPUID diff and smoke test on Icelake ran clean. For supported_xss, would it make sense to handle it purely in common x86 code, e.g. stub in something similar to supported_xcr0? KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS would be 0 for now. I assume whatever XSAVES features are supported will be "supported" by both VMX and SVM, in the sense that VMX/SVM won't need to mask off features that can exist on their respective hardware but can't be exposed to the guest. diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index 4dca3579e740..c6e9910d1149 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -1371,8 +1371,6 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void) { kvm_set_cpu_caps(); - supported_xss = 0; - /* CPUID 0x80000001 and 0x8000000A (SVM features) */ if (nested) { kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVM); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index 8001070b209c..e91a84bb251c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -7126,7 +7126,6 @@ static __init void vmx_set_cpu_caps(void) kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_UMIP); /* CPUID 0xD.1 */ - supported_xss = 0; if (!vmx_xsaves_supported()) kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 96e897d38a63..29cfe80db4b4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -9628,6 +9628,8 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void) if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) supported_xss = 0; + else + supported_xss = host_xss & KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS; cr4_reserved_bits = kvm_host_cr4_reserved_bits(&boot_cpu_data);