Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:25:40 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Instrumentation and RCU
Message-ID: <20200309212540.GV2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <87mu8p797b.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20200309204710.GU2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
 <20200309165811.05603ce0@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200309165811.05603ce0@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 04:58:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:47:10 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, I know.  Just what the kernel doesn't need, yet another variant
> > of RCU...
> 
> And call this variant: yarcu (Yet Another RCU) (pronounced yar-ku ?)

I was thinking in terms of rcu_read_lock_trace(), but hey!

							Thanx, Paul