Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] seccomp: add compat_ioctl for seccomp notify
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:33:32 +0100
Message-Id: <20200310123332.42255-1-svens@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

executing the seccomp_bpf testsuite with 32 bit userland (both s390 and x86)
doesn't work because there's no compat_ioctl handler defined. Is that something
that is supposed to work? Disclaimer: I don't know enough about seccomp to judge
whether there would be some adjustments required in the compat ioctl handler.
Just setting it to seccomp_notify_ioctl() makes the testsuite pass, but i'm not
sure whether that's correct.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index b6ea3dcb57bf..683c81e4861e 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1221,6 +1221,7 @@ static const struct file_operations seccomp_notify_ops = {
 	.poll = seccomp_notify_poll,
 	.release = seccomp_notify_release,
 	.unlocked_ioctl = seccomp_notify_ioctl,
+	.compat_ioctl = seccomp_notify_ioctl,
 };
 
 static struct file *init_listener(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
-- 
2.17.1