Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:03:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:03:43 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:45839 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:03:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 01:03:47 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Neil Brown Cc: Tim Walberg , James Sutherland , Ben Greear , , Subject: Re: RFC - tree quotas for Linux (2.4.12, ext2) In-Reply-To: <15311.31962.850647.50079@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday October 18, twalberg@mindspring.com wrote: > > A semi-random thought on the tree-quota concept: > > > > Does it really make sense to charge a tree quota to a single specific > > user? I haven't really looked into what would be required to implement > > it, but my mental picture of a tree quota is somewhat divorced from the > > user concept, > However I actually want to charge usage to users. > There is a natural mapping from users to directory trees via the > concept of the home-directory. Say ... /home/students ? Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed) http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/