Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp877538ybh;
        Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvBp0AQLOwclZIbbUhdHUsFayh3uHzkb+N/GnxjQb3DMJEmWch0EDfKD5mTcmRZjli5InvI
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:210f:: with SMTP id i15mr17346749otc.335.1583859472791;
        Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583859472; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=LMK0ucge3oZEDFxGJnhlDekMAFPyUKgKO2HYmn59JIMCbAjY8FFoew7Vx8lYYcYxEE
         YbUotMV6hXH4tSdVTWzAV/vaR3NnKNpt5m4OwlgmCiR9QNhrc61/ka5KMsuBvQbBCFby
         Wc3A9T/5INk7/eXni927wTckBP+ARr4nFJEOOtmaxBx4MQySbpX5ZXR6D8rJzyfJarel
         VEW620sV2Uuu32YtgNOWaDinVWWZW7ls7xHq+lMgogd4XfuDTMZVxF1yghhIxnm4Q1N0
         QwzU7mzOLc9mvUGmXijjg/7j7yMNDLDZauDjkjbUBPxfDzNcvT0Lj+5GRo+BNuISuJ0J
         qcGw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-language
         :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date
         :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject;
        bh=1rXJB6O3w65wmdU1vHyUgtRQow/9yRFuvGW6DMKa4GM=;
        b=m5Rtp/o3F1msXhQMZsMrpZFOGhBx5YJSXLvQvLy753c4U7hXbNy1/5Z6Bld238lH6r
         3HxmDcBhgwElp6AqRfKerKudRQqpTvCY7tvco6ZmYsDcoUDTCiDWDsJLgJsPHq96rM2S
         VtUyeqUe5ZOAbVZyMuha1RACsA9yo3W5XzIDJru2PhBuP90j/RkzFS6G51nBOy8ZSY7P
         M4srlXR4pWpXwoY79HjaP1ZdIqk5C9pfcLhOJy8t7Pmh2dhyDxdkbFkrmuiwqVOYEv7B
         uC5wqtLsozWKaK7li0j+ivdOwVBKQWo07pp5+kBv+N1zsm6J0xyeMktQpmq84HzM7PGG
         FhPQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=WuvedLsS;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v142si530053oie.217.2020.03.10.09.57.39;
        Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=WuvedLsS;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727171AbgCJQ4p (ORCPT <rfc822;schlichte.alexander@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:56:45 -0400
Received: from hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:12915 "EHLO
        hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726477AbgCJQ4m (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:56:42 -0400
Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA)
        id <B5e67c66d0000>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:09 -0700
Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6])
  by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service);
  Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:56:39 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
        by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:56:39 -0700
Received: from [10.2.175.232] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com
 (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 10 Mar
 2020 16:56:39 +0000
Subject: Re: LKFT: arm x15: mmc1: cache flush error -110
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
CC:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@nvidia.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
        Kishon <kishon@ti.com>
References: <CA+G9fYuqAQfhzF2BzHr7vMHx68bo8-jT+ob_F3eHQ3=oFjgYdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDyKFq5NoeHEBK3sv3yOSD2+pm9FueH1gaTyPq0j7GLfa6vnA@mail.gmail.com>
 <34fd84d7-387b-b6f3-7fb3-aa490909e205@ti.com>
 <CAPDyKFrrO4noYqdxWL9Y8Nx75LopbDudKGMotkGbGcAF1oq==w@mail.gmail.com>
 <5e9b5646-bd48-e55b-54ee-1c2c41fc9218@nvidia.com>
 <CAPDyKFqpNo_4OePBR1KnJNO=kR8XEqbcsEd=icSceSdDH+Rk1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <757853cf-987e-f6b6-9259-b4560a031692@nvidia.com>
 <d12fe142-7e72-ab58-33ab-17817e35096f@nvidia.com>
 <c216f131-6f83-c9c9-9d17-8d44ec06972d@nvidia.com>
 <87ad7586-9569-4276-044a-adb64e84ca15@nvidia.com>
 <a0962e0b-0f1d-9f32-f6e9-92f69f93167f@nvidia.com>
 <57ddddc2-3ee8-d867-bba0-0dd9929ba37d@nvidia.com>
 <CAPDyKFqZSd9E3+16yFsmpee2JsbRJ-DGThxx7NJHu6UE00Xi1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <26ee7225-9483-4664-c2d7-b5cefeadcd4b@nvidia.com>
 <CAPDyKFqwVQDEnPNi33mc9ycTxpaT1cRLejbR3Ja4c8dha4gFRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <0301bbd5-8d4d-4a77-42c7-8a1391c2d60a@nvidia.com>
 <CAPDyKFp93H0=ttazofW9NMBtL5VnjB4PdkwN0FDCtWR0pMHrPA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <f01b5533-124a-d978-a90a-9c9c6235fb65@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:59:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFp93H0=ttazofW9NMBtL5VnjB4PdkwN0FDCtWR0pMHrPA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To
 HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1;
        t=1583859309; bh=1rXJB6O3w65wmdU1vHyUgtRQow/9yRFuvGW6DMKa4GM=;
        h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:
         User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:
         X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
         Content-Language;
        b=WuvedLsSTPBdpARiO5Y8Pv6S1//sXIHDpIZ3eyZ1hVnVuphMbVTQhek6JB3AoIz7y
         0KoStFudD4FoDTRb7VF3I2n8eNzXkiuQzj5d5/FK21ttyJ67Cou4ofY9sJnb52Fwtn
         PAljCFF3BYI9gElmM5wAAfK5rS9DUYcfit4Q/g7v6jhgKFlmn0wW/pIr3Y51oOEROI
         fEVtLj/aonB0n5FpM1soy0AfsHDmHyz20uUQ+qo+sKHCkrR2GZDV82mWmRQoUGS4HG
         bSB5/iotRJVnjaMJ1//FYikr1ujmIIaPL9B9srOtjHeX/02BswH19u0tKsCqSjQ9b3
         VdOaFkSNcflnQ==
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 3/10/20 2:46 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 18:33, Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/6/20 3:14 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually we always use R1B with CMD6 as per spec.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I fully agree that R1B is preferable, but it's not against the
>>>>>>>>>>>> spec to
>>>>>>>>>>>> send CMD13 to poll for busy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Moreover, we need to cope with the scenario when the host has
>>>>>>>>>>>> specified a maximum timeout that isn't sufficiently long enough for
>>>>>>>>>>>> the requested operation. Do you have another proposal for how to
>>>>>>>>>>>> manage this, but disabling MMC_RSP_BUSY?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's assume you driver would get a R1B for the CMD6 (we force it),
>>>>>>>>>>>> then what timeout would the driver be using if we would set
>>>>>>>>>>>> cmd.busy_timeout to 30ms?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry didn't understood clearly. Are you asking with 30s timeout, whats
>>>>>> the data timeout counter used?
>>>>> Yes. It seems like it will pick the maximum, which is 11s?
>>>> yes
>>> Okay, thanks!
>>>
>>>>>> Because of above mentioned issue on our host where CMD interrupt happens
>>>>>> after busy state, poll for busy returns right away as not busy.
>>>>> I see.
>>>>>
>>>>>> So issuing CMD13 after CMD6-R1 followed by busy poll should be working.
>>>>>> But weird that with small delay of 1ms or debug print before CMD13 it
>>>>>> doesn't timeout and works all the time.
>>>>> I have digested the information you provided in these emails. Let me
>>>>> summarize it, to see if I have understood correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> Your controller can't distinguish between R1 and R1B because of a
>>>>> limitation in the HW. So, in both cases you need to wait for the card
>>>>> to stop signal busy, before the controller can give an IRQ to notify
>>>>> that the R1 response has been received. Correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> In this context, I am wondering if sdhci_send_command(), really
>>>>> conforms to these requirements. For example, depending on if the CMD6
>>>>> has MMC_RSP_BUSY or not, it may pick either SDHCI_CMD_RESP_SHORT or
>>>>> SDHCI_CMD_RESP_SHORT_BUSY.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this work as expected for your case?
>>>> Design team re-verified internally and bug where HW waits for busy state
>>>> before IRQ is only for R1B and R1 is spec compliant.
>>>>
>>>> So, with R1, CMD complete is generated after response received.
>>> Okay.
>>>
>>> So, the issue we see for CMD6 with R1, is a software problem that we
>>> should be able to fix.
>>>
>>>> With R1B, CMD complete and xfer complete both are generated after
>>>> response received + device busy (max timeout of 11s)
>>>> DATA timeout interrupt will be asserted incase if HW busy detection fails.
>>>>
>>>> With R1B we may see DATA Timeout if operation takes more than max busy
>>>> timeout of 11s.
>>> Okay, I see.
>>>
>>>>> 2.
>>>>> Assuming my interpretation of the above is somewhat correct. Then you
>>>>> always need to set a busy timeout for R1/R1B responses in the
>>>>> controller. The maximum timeout seems to be 11s long. Obviously, this
>>>>> isn't enough for all cases, such as cache flushing and erase, for
>>>>> example. So, what can we do to support a longer timeouts than 11s?
>>>>> Would it be possible to disable the HW timeout, if the requested
>>>>> timeout is longer than 11s and use a SW timeout instead?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Uffe
>>>> For erase long operations we have register bit to enable for infinite
>>>> busy wait mode where host controller would be monitoring until card is busy.
>>> Alright, that sounds great!
>>>
>>>> But so far for emmc devices we used on our platforms, we haven't seen
>>>> cache flush taking more than 11s.
>>> I understand that 11s is probably fine to use, for most cases.
>>>
>>> However, it's not spec compliant, as for some operations there are
>>> simply no timeout specified. BKOPS, cache flush, sanitize are cases
>>> like this - and then 11s is definitely not sufficient.
>>>
>>>> Will get back on possibility of disabling HW timeout and using SW timeout..
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> I would like to get the regression fixed asap, but I also would like
>>> to avoid reverting patches, unless really necessary. May I propose the
>>> following two options.
>>>
>>> 1. Find out why polling with ->card_busy() or CMD13, for a CMD6 with
>>> an R1 response doesn't work - and then fix that behaviour.
>>>
>>> 2. Set the mmc->max_busy_timeout to zero for sdhci-tegra, which makes
>>> the core to always use R1B for CMD6 (and erase). This also means that
>>> when the cmd->busy_timeout becomes longer than 11s, sdhci-tegra must
>>> disable the HW busy timeout and just wait "forever".
>>>
>>> If you decide for 2, you can add the software timeout support on top,
>>> but make that can be considered as a next step of an improvement,
>>> rather than needed as fix. Note that, I believe there are some support
>>> for software timeout already in the sdhci core, maybe you need to
>>> tweak it a bit for your case, I don't know.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Uffe
>> Hi Uffe
>>
>> Will go with 2nd option and will send patches out when ready.
> Okay, good.
>
>> BTW, Tegra host also supports SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK for
>> data timeout based on host clock when using finite mode (HW busy
>> detection based on DATA TIMEOUT count value when cmd operation timeout
>> is < 11s for tegra host).
>>
>> So, looks like we cant set host max_busy_timeout to 0 for Tegra host to
>> force R1B during SWITCH and SLEEP_AWAKE.
>>
>> So, was thinking to introduce host capability MMC_CAP2_LONG_WAIT_HW_BUSY
>> which can be used for hosts supporting long or infinite HW busy wait
>> detection and will update mmc and mmc_ops drivers to not allow convert
>> R1B to R1B for hosts with this capability during SLEEP_AWAKE and SWITCH.
> That seems reasonable, it becomes probably both easier and clearer by
> adding a new host cap.
>
> In any case, let me help out and cook a patch for this for the core
> part (I leave the sdhci change to you). It may be a bit tricky,
> especially since I have currently queued a bunch of new changes for
> v5.7, that enables more users of mmc_poll_for_busy() in the core.
> Maybe I need to temporarily drop them, so we can fix these problems
> first. I will check.
>
> Probably, I would also name the cap MMC_CAP_HW_NEED_RSP_BUSY, as that
> seems to be describing the common problem we have for sdhci
> omap/tegra.
>
> Finally, it seems like MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY should be set for
> sdhci- tegra, so while at it, perhaps you can cook a patch for that as
> well.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe

OK, I sent v1 yesterday. Please ignore them then.

Will send out patches only for HW busy wait modes program based on cmd 
timeout and WAIT_WHILE_BUSY enabled.

Thanks

Sowjanya