Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200310151503.11589-1-gpiccoli@canonical.com> <20200310110554.1fc016ad@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200310110554.1fc016ad@lwn.net>
From:   Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:20:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHD1Q_w26XP5fOcqW_toDLvEU0crt1dUUjiwCyWTn_U1-Nh=1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Better document the softlockup_panic sysctl
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        swood@redhat.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
        yzaikin@google.com, mingo@kernel.org,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@gpiccoli.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:05 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> So this doesn't even come close to applying; could you respin it against
> docs-next, please?

Sure, will resubmit soon. I understand docs-next is just linux-next
correct? I couldn't find any specific docs tree on kernel.org ...


>
> ..and while you're at it, make it "*the* kernel.softlockup_panic sysctl" :)


Sure! Thanks for the review,


Guilherme