Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:54:25 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] dt-bindings: display: Add idk-2121wr binding
Message-ID: <20200310195425.GA23440@ravnborg.org>
References: <1583869169-1006-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1583869169-1006-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Prabhakar

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:39:29PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
> 
> Add binding for the idk-2121wr LVDS panel from Advantech.
> 
> Some panel-specific documentation can be found here:
> https://buy.advantech.eu/Displays/Embedded-LCD-Kits-High-Brightness/model-IDK-2121WR-K2FHA2E.htm
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi All,
> This patch is part of series [1] ("Add dual-LVDS panel support to EK874),
> all the patches have been accepted from it except this one. I have fixed
> Rob's comments in this version of the patch.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11297589/
> 
> V7->8
>  * Dropped ref to lvds.yaml, since the panel a dual channel LVDS, as a
>    result the root port is called as ports instead of port and the child
>    node port@0 and port@1 are used for even and odd pixels, hence binding
>    has required property as ports instead of port.

Looks good, thanks for your persistence..
Applied and pushed to drm-misc-next.

	Sam