Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] zd1211rw/zd_usb.h: Replace zero-length array with
 flexible-array member
To:     Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
References: <20200305111216.GA24982@embeddedor>
 <87k13yq2jo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
 <256881484c5db07e47c611a56550642a6f6bd8e9.camel@perches.com>
 <87blpapyu5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
 <1bb7270f-545b-23ca-aa27-5b3c52fba1be@embeddedor.com>
 <87r1y0nwip.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
 <48ff1333-0a14-36d8-9565-a7f13a06c974@embeddedor.com>
 <021d1125-3ffd-39ef-395a-b796c527bde4@gmail.com>
 <fb3395d7-e932-10ac-1feb-ab2ceb63424e@embeddedor.com>
 <361da904-5adf-eb0c-e937-c5d2f69ac8be@gmail.com>
 <e4cfda6c-37f0-3c28-f50b-32200a67d856@embeddedor.com>
 <9700b2c9-1029-60b0-c5d2-684bdcede354@gmail.com>
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=gustavo@embeddedor.com; keydata=
 mQINBFssHAwBEADIy3ZoPq3z5UpsUknd2v+IQud4TMJnJLTeXgTf4biSDSrXn73JQgsISBwG
 2Pm4wnOyEgYUyJd5tRWcIbsURAgei918mck3tugT7AQiTUN3/5aAzqe/4ApDUC+uWNkpNnSV
 tjOx1hBpla0ifywy4bvFobwSh5/I3qohxDx+c1obd8Bp/B/iaOtnq0inli/8rlvKO9hp6Z4e
 DXL3PlD0QsLSc27AkwzLEc/D3ZaqBq7ItvT9Pyg0z3Q+2dtLF00f9+663HVC2EUgP25J3xDd
 496SIeYDTkEgbJ7WYR0HYm9uirSET3lDqOVh1xPqoy+U9zTtuA9NQHVGk+hPcoazSqEtLGBk
 YE2mm2wzX5q2uoyptseSNceJ+HE9L+z1KlWW63HhddgtRGhbP8pj42bKaUSrrfDUsicfeJf6
 m1iJRu0SXYVlMruGUB1PvZQ3O7TsVfAGCv85pFipdgk8KQnlRFkYhUjLft0u7CL1rDGZWDDr
 NaNj54q2CX9zuSxBn9XDXvGKyzKEZ4NY1Jfw+TAMPCp4buawuOsjONi2X0DfivFY+ZsjAIcx
 qQMglPtKk/wBs7q2lvJ+pHpgvLhLZyGqzAvKM1sVtRJ5j+ARKA0w4pYs5a5ufqcfT7dN6TBk
 LXZeD9xlVic93Ju08JSUx2ozlcfxq+BVNyA+dtv7elXUZ2DrYwARAQABtCxHdXN0YXZvIEEu
 IFIuIFNpbHZhIDxndXN0YXZvQGVtYmVkZGVkb3IuY29tPokCPQQTAQgAJwUCWywcDAIbIwUJ
 CWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBHBbTLRwbbMZ6tEACk0hmmZ2FWL1Xi
 l/bPqDGFhzzexrdkXSfTTZjBV3a+4hIOe+jl6Rci/CvRicNW4H9yJHKBrqwwWm9fvKqOBAg9
 obq753jydVmLwlXO7xjcfyfcMWyx9QdYLERTeQfDAfRqxir3xMeOiZwgQ6dzX3JjOXs6jHBP
 cgry90aWbaMpQRRhaAKeAS14EEe9TSIly5JepaHoVdASuxklvOC0VB0OwNblVSR2S5i5hSsh
 ewbOJtwSlonsYEj4EW1noQNSxnN/vKuvUNegMe+LTtnbbocFQ7dGMsT3kbYNIyIsp42B5eCu
 JXnyKLih7rSGBtPgJ540CjoPBkw2mCfhj2p5fElRJn1tcX2McsjzLFY5jK9RYFDavez5w3lx
 JFgFkla6sQHcrxH62gTkb9sUtNfXKucAfjjCMJ0iuQIHRbMYCa9v2YEymc0k0RvYr43GkA3N
 PJYd/vf9vU7VtZXaY4a/dz1d9dwIpyQARFQpSyvt++R74S78eY/+lX8wEznQdmRQ27kq7BJS
 R20KI/8knhUNUJR3epJu2YFT/JwHbRYC4BoIqWl+uNvDf+lUlI/D1wP+lCBSGr2LTkQRoU8U
 64iK28BmjJh2K3WHmInC1hbUucWT7Swz/+6+FCuHzap/cjuzRN04Z3Fdj084oeUNpP6+b9yW
 e5YnLxF8ctRAp7K4yVlvA7kCDQRbLBwMARAAsHCE31Ffrm6uig1BQplxMV8WnRBiZqbbsVJB
 H1AAh8tq2ULl7udfQo1bsPLGGQboJSVN9rckQQNahvHAIK8ZGfU4Qj8+CER+fYPp/MDZj+t0
 DbnWSOrG7z9HIZo6PR9z4JZza3Hn/35jFggaqBtuydHwwBANZ7A6DVY+W0COEU4of7CAahQo
 5NwYiwS0lGisLTqks5R0Vh+QpvDVfuaF6I8LUgQR/cSgLkR//V1uCEQYzhsoiJ3zc1HSRyOP
 otJTApqGBq80X0aCVj1LOiOF4rrdvQnj6iIlXQssdb+WhSYHeuJj1wD0ZlC7ds5zovXh+FfF
 l5qH5RFY/qVn3mNIVxeO987WSF0jh+T5ZlvUNdhedGndRmwFTxq2Li6GNMaolgnpO/CPcFpD
 jKxY/HBUSmaE9rNdAa1fCd4RsKLlhXda+IWpJZMHlmIKY8dlUybP+2qDzP2lY7kdFgPZRU+e
 zS/pzC/YTzAvCWM3tDgwoSl17vnZCr8wn2/1rKkcLvTDgiJLPCevqpTb6KFtZosQ02EGMuHQ
 I6Zk91jbx96nrdsSdBLGH3hbvLvjZm3C+fNlVb9uvWbdznObqcJxSH3SGOZ7kCHuVmXUcqoz
 ol6ioMHMb+InrHPP16aVDTBTPEGwgxXI38f7SUEn+NpbizWdLNz2hc907DvoPm6HEGCanpcA
 EQEAAYkCJQQYAQgADwUCWywcDAIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRBHBbTLRwbbMdsZEACUjmsJx2CAY+QS
 UMebQRFjKavwXB/xE7fTt2ahuhHT8qQ/lWuRQedg4baInw9nhoPE+VenOzhGeGlsJ0Ys52sd
 XvUjUocKgUQq6ekOHbcw919nO5L9J2ejMf/VC/quN3r3xijgRtmuuwZjmmi8ct24TpGeoBK4
 WrZGh/1hAYw4ieARvKvgjXRstcEqM5thUNkOOIheud/VpY+48QcccPKbngy//zNJWKbRbeVn
 imua0OpqRXhCrEVm/xomeOvl1WK1BVO7z8DjSdEBGzbV76sPDJb/fw+y+VWrkEiddD/9CSfg
 fBNOb1p1jVnT2mFgGneIWbU0zdDGhleI9UoQTr0e0b/7TU+Jo6TqwosP9nbk5hXw6uR5k5PF
 8ieyHVq3qatJ9K1jPkBr8YWtI5uNwJJjTKIA1jHlj8McROroxMdI6qZ/wZ1ImuylpJuJwCDC
 ORYf5kW61fcrHEDlIvGc371OOvw6ejF8ksX5+L2zwh43l/pKkSVGFpxtMV6d6J3eqwTafL86
 YJWH93PN+ZUh6i6Rd2U/i8jH5WvzR57UeWxE4P8bQc0hNGrUsHQH6bpHV2lbuhDdqo+cM9eh
 GZEO3+gCDFmKrjspZjkJbB5Gadzvts5fcWGOXEvuT8uQSvl+vEL0g6vczsyPBtqoBLa9SNrS
 VtSixD1uOgytAP7RWS474w==
Message-ID: <948ec681-c4ee-3479-8d8b-5aa1e358ec04@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:36:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9700b2c9-1029-60b0-c5d2-684bdcede354@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 3/10/20 5:34 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/10/20 6:31 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/20 5:20 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>> On 3/10/20 6:13 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/10/20 5:07 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>>>> As I stated in my previous answer, this seems more code churn than an
>>>>> actual fix. If this is a real problem, shouldn't the work be put into
>>>>> fixing the compiler to handle foo[0] instead? It seems that is where the
>>>>> real value would be.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. But, unfortunately, I'm not a compiler guy, so I'm not able to fix the
>>>> compiler as you suggest. And I honestly don't see what is so annoying/disturbing
>>>> about applying a patch that removes the 0 from foo[0] when it brings benefit
>>>> to the whole codebase.
>>>
>>> My point is that it adds what seems like unnecessary churn, which is not
>>> a benefit, and it doesn't improve the generated code.
>>>
>>
>> As an example of one of the benefits of this is that the compiler won't trigger
>> a warning in the following case:
>>
>> struct boo {
>> 	int stuff;
>> 	struct foo array[0];
>> 	int morestuff;
>> };
>>
>> The result of the code above is an undefined behavior.
>>
>> On the other hand in the case below, the compiles does trigger a warning:
>>
>> struct boo {
>> 	int stuff;
>> 	struct foo array[];
>> 	int morestuff;
>> };
> 
> Right, this just underlines my prior argument, that this should be fixed
> in the compiler.
> 

In the meantime it's not at all harmful to do something about it in the codebase.

Thanks
--
Gustavo