Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp1208444ybh; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:18:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuCf7cY0OzBC3rVUcGBbHMhfeSGO8/JqIHRJ/LAf4Jx1v4oW0kkNygwkl4AK2q8hOumSdgV X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5a09:: with SMTP id v9mr278261oth.214.1583885902383; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:18:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583885902; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WqGkH6QdsAxkawz6+phHjNz5m0y6BEdi3eACDdCipsySx/ax8BLeUfUT5NjvJZldbB Ms8Cg0vAEGuQp7hANuJKkqksPNOT7lfqN/PWfWYqeIdgX2qmDZ7ulPCB9w223gm63J0b RFDlLOBKT9xXg0tex9V9BJ/gkTu2sBwP30v7EWCVc9mGnBelDbph02p7JmYX2PTOAQj2 yFMnsG85I05TJFIUlchibS6JZtSXGkIHjmVNcvDoi8hcyfH435f0qrZfbZeDOZ2cjzUw qZwjKiGmZtHL0w1IZd2JDkqJhpZ1bmN6b1DrUIvLBbUmwfqE0S9e8aFiuvHdeIoLO80R ibww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=V2dsBEvsnZtxwyXVDZqOwkEWWlpfWVhQm3b7zjDhylA=; b=FtCPPh3mbPN82ZQn4zEensLRh/I5HtFcuZ/3Iwki6vBJfu9rZbWPtmxXiSCZse0zbc yXXxFm/MDecW16ffnekZxHroSbbc2JHoHqdJaQpCoNziYpOzUmzD+tanEo7Cj71NCBj4 NgRVVbWGxu86j1MWQbSWVqMrFrvdI3tR5l0GFtkRzMJPCHMXsqyIs0yg9KA3Ejb8sDAz zkK+QeRdH0sjY8xPD8JGBmf0IP7c/Lw84iz+ZoCe5YT4xcRNoRqHJAfWqD8acpW7ZGbY jQgkW5zxjCh8sBUVvATWqbem81eNJ9lCASV9xsm+x41Hlv4Juz+KKi7kokHjE4APYzPu sWAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si155958otn.118.2020.03.10.17.18.07; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727733AbgCKARp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:17:45 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:40022 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726463AbgCKARp (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:17:45 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBp3z-0008FJ-R6; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:17:31 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jBp3y-0000VK-Vy; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:17:31 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Jann Horn Cc: Bernd Edlinger , Christian Brauner , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan , Thomas Gleixner , Oleg Nesterov , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrei Vagin , Ingo Molnar , "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Yuyang Du , David Hildenbrand , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Anshuman Khandual , David Howells , James Morris , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Shakeel Butt , Jason Gunthorpe , Christian Kellner , Andrea Arcangeli , Aleksa Sarai , "Dmitry V. Levin" , "linux-doc\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm\@kvack.org" , "stable\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api\@vger.kernel.org" References: <875zfmloir.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9nmjulm.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <202003021531.C77EF10@keescook> <20200303085802.eqn6jbhwxtmz4j2x@wittgenstein> <87v9nlii0b.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a74xi4kz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r1y8dqqz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87tv32cxmf.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9ne5y4y.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87zhcq4jdj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87wo7roq2c.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:15:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jann Horn's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:21:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87k13roigf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1jBp3y-0000VK-Vy;;;mid=<87k13roigf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX191GcjSpm9Har/C6Rc/ejl26zceokkfPxs= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4981] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Jann Horn X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 401 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.6 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 2.5 (0.6%), parse: 1.23 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (3.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.38 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 28 (6.9%), tests_pri_-950: 1.46 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.42 (0.4%), tests_pri_-90: 60 (14.8%), check_bayes: 58 (14.4%), b_tokenize: 25 (6.2%), b_tok_get_all: 10 (2.5%), b_comp_prob: 2.8 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 4.0 (1.0%), b_finish: 0.76 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 282 (70.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.55 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 14 (3.4%), poll_dns_idle: 12 (2.9%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] exec: Add a exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jann Horn writes: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:33 PM Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> Jann Horn writes: >> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:41 PM Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> The cred_guard_mutex is problematic. The cred_guard_mutex is held >> >> over the userspace accesses as the arguments from userspace are read. >> >> The cred_guard_mutex is held of PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT as the the other >> >> threads are killed. The cred_guard_mutex is held over >> >> "put_user(0, tsk->clear_child_tid)" in exit_mm(). >> >> >> >> Any of those can result in deadlock, as the cred_guard_mutex is held >> >> over a possible indefinite userspace waits for userspace. >> >> >> >> Add exec_update_mutex that is only held over exec updating process >> >> with the new contents of exec, so that code that needs not to be >> >> confused by exec changing the mm and the cred in ways that can not >> >> happen during ordinary execution of a process. >> >> >> >> The plan is to switch the users of cred_guard_mutex to >> >> exec_udpate_mutex one by one. This lets us move forward while still >> >> being careful and not introducing any regressions. >> > [...] >> >> @@ -1034,6 +1035,11 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) >> >> return -EINTR; >> >> } >> >> } >> >> + >> >> + ret = mutex_lock_killable(&tsk->signal->exec_update_mutex); >> >> + if (ret) >> >> + return ret; >> > >> > We're already holding the old mmap_sem, and now nest the >> > exec_update_mutex inside it; but then while still holding the >> > exec_update_mutex, we do mmput(), which can e.g. end up in ksm_exit(), >> > which can do down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) from __ksm_exit(). So I think >> > at least lockdep will be unhappy, and I'm not sure whether it's an >> > actual problem or not. >> >> Good point. I should double check the lock ordering here with mmap_sem. >> It doesn't look like mmput takes mmap_sem > > You sure about that? mmput() -> __mmput() -> ksm_exit() -> > __ksm_exit() -> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) > > Or also: mmput() -> __mmput() -> khugepaged_exit() -> > __khugepaged_exit() -> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) > > Or is there a reason why those paths can't happen? Clearly I didn't look far enough. I will adjust this so that exec_update_mutex is taken before mmap_sem. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Eric