Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To:     masonccyang@mxic.com.tw
Cc:     "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
        allison@lohutok.net, bbrezillon@kernel.org,
        frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, juliensu@mxic.com.tw,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        rfontana@redhat.com, richard@nod.at, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
        stefan@agner.ch, tglx@linutronix.de, vigneshr@ti.com,
        yuehaibing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific
 lock/unlock operation
Message-ID: <20200311082522.53313163@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <OFCDE22522.001A7410-ON48258528.000E260F-48258528.000EA7E7@mxic.com.tw>
References: <1583220084-10890-1-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
        <1583220084-10890-2-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
        <20200310202723.16b48f4b@collabora.com>
        <OFCDE22522.001A7410-ON48258528.000E260F-48258528.000EA7E7@mxic.com.tw>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mason, Boris,

masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:40:04 +0800:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> > > Add nand_lock() & nand_unlock() for manufacturer specific lock &   
> unlock
> > > operation while the device supports Block Portection function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>  
> > 
> > Reported-by on something that's not a fix doesn't make sense. I know
> > the 0day bot asked you to add this tag, but that should only be done if
> > you submit a separate patch, ideally with a Fixes tag. If the offending
> > patch has not been merged yet, you should just fix the commit and ignore
> > the Reported-by tag (you can mention who reported the problem in the
> > changelog though).

Yesterday when applying all the NAND patches my personal IP address got
flagged as spam by mistake (~500 mails in ~10s) so I could not answer
manually as I wished.

Indeed, this Reported-by tag was not needed and I dropped it manually
when applying. This tag is meant to show an error that was existing
*before* your series and that you are fixing with your series. This is
not something you should add when a robot tells you something is wrong
in your series.

Also, I rewrote several paragraphs and I prefixed two of them with "mtd:
rawnand: macronix:".

Thanks,
Miquèl