Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp339552ybh; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:05:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvsg3iTsBZ9RyvwaK2g4r2zyyjzSQsRxO1wo1d/q8KUtctWVjCvEF+CUygAz6AyqdjucMto X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3b6:: with SMTP id f51mr1583728otf.255.1583917526770; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:05:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583917526; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0S4v7sf359af7SZwZsaS2rw5X06056Wd/UmoZ5sWDEnlU2Zve5JK97NPqvuFguNTHE 5VwYHFnDrZmIjXWMGXwWbsYh/7Em4+h4pKSwu0DT3MddXqugXL7zVdMAb/CnQ/YczbTj crJkCuUx+UVmkcuavr3Ni0Q9QUwhhgRVdA3H+1nEtjdm311CAH+c4BaUSOe77vUrQAUM hfmiklr4KxdmWWugmIWOLZqz0jZiMRThOoRNLKAzl2Dv2qqevxjRZYsXmhEeYgvmG8B3 od+Z+j3s2kTxmv8ov5QqzlSSxEsXpK4Yc+nm8qRTptxueGe1OrXggLntilbxF/QaBjHX ZqkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=imMMf3+uLdBx5yK23fMfBZ4aeL6gsOlj6qd7q2Uc9VM=; b=ygXa8HhrQKZQEpnIrN7kcK8xuHrQF3jmYuhqF4XKK71NwLNDqPdFb3pk480HMpFM+t ei7DnzxCYMY9ObzvyXvs3KxYXe34esKyAUfsPxxI7Gg/OD9Pjbiz+r8CIu+ZyDpcLPTm /ZiO3OZZG6GbXITgdolLARRxbje/DtRAVWAnMWHaw/nNs9BZFzQ+NHlNAgoXL/nC4HGa +s9rHFD7hzMeLa+PCwmfK8kMJ8LpomMIdRQHWjZcrktnFOMpQDzA1enD5NYIHAM6TAXq KkNS9aY/zjZTgBxwljHkuM9n21UyxNVHzOmFEFr+g2v4icFU1YJ7v0sKcqgMYzQreMfv N/Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t24si807994oth.319.2020.03.11.02.05.15; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728568AbgCKJEx (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:04:53 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39618 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726097AbgCKJEx (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:04:53 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E4CAD08; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:04:47 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Bruce Rogers Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ioremap: Map EFI runtime services data as encrypted for SEV Message-ID: <20200311090447.GI7028@suse.de> References: <2d9e16eb5b53dc82665c95c6764b7407719df7a0.1582645327.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> <20200310124003.GE29372@zn.tnic> <20200310130321.GH7028@suse.de> <20200310163738.GF29372@zn.tnic> <20200310174712.GG29372@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200310174712.GG29372@zn.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 06:47:31PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Ok, here's what I have. @joro, I know it is trivially different from the > version you tested but I'd appreciate it if you ran it again, just to be > sure. Looks good and ested it, works fine. Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel Tested-by: Joerg Roedel > --- > >From 244b62ca142c6296361bde953488fc64db31f1bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tom Lendacky > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:35:57 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] x86/ioremap: Map EFI runtime services data as encrypted for > SEV > > The dmidecode program fails to properly decode the SMBIOS data supplied > by OVMF/UEFI when running in an SEV guest. The SMBIOS area, under SEV, is > encrypted and resides in reserved memory that is marked as EFI runtime > services data. > > As a result, when memremap() is attempted for the SMBIOS data, it > can't be mapped as regular RAM (through try_ram_remap()) and, since > the address isn't part of the iomem resources list, it isn't mapped > encrypted through the fallback ioremap(). > > Add a new __ioremap_check_other() to deal with memory types like > EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA which are not covered by the resource ranges. > > This allows any runtime services data, which has been created encrypted, > to be mapped encrypted. > > [ bp: Move functionality to a separate function. ] > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > Cc: # 5.3 > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2d9e16eb5b53dc82665c95c6764b7407719df7a0.1582645327.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com > --- > arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > index 44e4beb4239f..935a91e1fd77 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > @@ -106,6 +106,19 @@ static unsigned int __ioremap_check_encrypted(struct resource *res) > return 0; > } > > +/* > + * The EFI runtime services data area is not covered by walk_mem_res(), but must > + * be mapped encrypted when SEV is active. > + */ > +static void __ioremap_check_other(resource_size_t addr, struct ioremap_desc *desc) > +{ > + if (!sev_active()) > + return; > + > + if (efi_mem_type(addr) == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) > + desc->flags |= IORES_MAP_ENCRYPTED; > +} > + > static int __ioremap_collect_map_flags(struct resource *res, void *arg) > { > struct ioremap_desc *desc = arg; > @@ -124,6 +137,9 @@ static int __ioremap_collect_map_flags(struct resource *res, void *arg) > * To avoid multiple resource walks, this function walks resources marked as > * IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_BUSY and looking for system RAM and/or a > * resource described not as IORES_DESC_NONE (e.g. IORES_DESC_ACPI_TABLES). > + * > + * After that, deal with misc other ranges in __ioremap_check_other() which do > + * not fall into the above category. > */ > static void __ioremap_check_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size, > struct ioremap_desc *desc) > @@ -135,6 +151,8 @@ static void __ioremap_check_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size, > memset(desc, 0, sizeof(struct ioremap_desc)); > > walk_mem_res(start, end, desc, __ioremap_collect_map_flags); > + > + __ioremap_check_other(addr, desc); > } > > /* > -- > 2.21.0 > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette