Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 9E3B3C433CB
From:   Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>,
        Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] block: Fix use-after-free issue accessing struct io_cq
Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:07:50 +0530
Message-Id: <1583923070-22245-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

There is a potential race between ioc_release_fn() and
ioc_clear_queue() as shown below, due to which below kernel
crash is observed. It also can result into use-after-free
issue.

context#1:				context#2:
ioc_release_fn()			__ioc_clear_queue() gets the same icq
->spin_lock(&ioc->lock);		->spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
->ioc_destroy_icq(icq);
  ->list_del_init(&icq->q_node);
  ->call_rcu(&icq->__rcu_head,
  	icq_free_icq_rcu);
->spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);
					->ioc_destroy_icq(icq);
					  ->hlist_del_init(&icq->ioc_node);
					  This results into below crash as this memory
					  is now used by icq->__rcu_head in context#1.
					  There is a chance that icq could be free'd
					  as well.

22150.386550:   <6> Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory
at virtual address ffffffaa8d31ca50
...
Call trace:
22150.607350:   <2>  ioc_destroy_icq+0x44/0x110
22150.611202:   <2>  ioc_clear_queue+0xac/0x148
22150.615056:   <2>  blk_cleanup_queue+0x11c/0x1a0
22150.619174:   <2>  __scsi_remove_device+0xdc/0x128
22150.623465:   <2>  scsi_forget_host+0x2c/0x78
22150.627315:   <2>  scsi_remove_host+0x7c/0x2a0
22150.631257:   <2>  usb_stor_disconnect+0x74/0xc8
22150.635371:   <2>  usb_unbind_interface+0xc8/0x278
22150.639665:   <2>  device_release_driver_internal+0x198/0x250
22150.644897:   <2>  device_release_driver+0x24/0x30
22150.649176:   <2>  bus_remove_device+0xec/0x140
22150.653204:   <2>  device_del+0x270/0x460
22150.656712:   <2>  usb_disable_device+0x120/0x390
22150.660918:   <2>  usb_disconnect+0xf4/0x2e0
22150.664684:   <2>  hub_event+0xd70/0x17e8
22150.668197:   <2>  process_one_work+0x210/0x480
22150.672222:   <2>  worker_thread+0x32c/0x4c8

Fix this by adding a new ICQ_DESTROYED flag in ioc_destroy_icq() to
indicate this icq is once marked as destroyed. Also, ensure
__ioc_clear_queue() is accessing icq within rcu_read_lock/unlock so
that icq doesn't get free'd up while it is still using it.

Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Co-developed-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
---
 block/blk-ioc.c           | 7 +++++++
 include/linux/iocontext.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c
index 5ed59ac..9df50fb 100644
--- a/block/blk-ioc.c
+++ b/block/blk-ioc.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static void ioc_destroy_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
 	 * making it impossible to determine icq_cache.  Record it in @icq.
 	 */
 	icq->__rcu_icq_cache = et->icq_cache;
+	icq->flags |= ICQ_DESTROYED;
 	call_rcu(&icq->__rcu_head, icq_free_icq_rcu);
 }
 
@@ -212,15 +213,21 @@ static void __ioc_clear_queue(struct list_head *icq_list)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	while (!list_empty(icq_list)) {
 		struct io_cq *icq = list_entry(icq_list->next,
 						struct io_cq, q_node);
 		struct io_context *ioc = icq->ioc;
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->lock, flags);
+		if (icq->flags & ICQ_DESTROYED) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
+			continue;
+		}
 		ioc_destroy_icq(icq);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/iocontext.h b/include/linux/iocontext.h
index dba15ca..1dcd919 100644
--- a/include/linux/iocontext.h
+++ b/include/linux/iocontext.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 
 enum {
 	ICQ_EXITED		= 1 << 2,
+	ICQ_DESTROYED		= 1 << 3,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.