Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp728357ybh; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:36:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vszJQ/6iOS/6T0PSaIk4UKC/Gd+D1xJB5gFPTe8uyslmIo0w0ZYHQA1yAGlS7rmDAXhS9ZP X-Received: by 2002:aca:170c:: with SMTP id j12mr2464993oii.50.1583944603009; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:36:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583944602; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S/H91qVPYUBZiMmaJ/L3laQ35ggHfGnwlYrb7XfNax4tLzi79TtzU+O7PbwLdVgttY guoVwLgT9u+L2GAjOe9CcmWzT5vVJAqiE5CoHRI7hkUHblyp1s32XRtmMn/a7V1j0Axd G2GiJE4szfkVE+uogy2BCPQgnfKcjI1LlIAKuL2EXVHsvWXL8tfDlgW+UYh1/2hIBkdM pfbKPOkUUUxjwV1bk9Dz5LQpSqhAIycXCPPGsqTBfGQreT50XFX6Bat600C/O9T1gnPD KMW1t5uH3/3/eeDwwzQfSrxKSjxCqjUY+ksXRpsRzZDehKC1LuKdqyDOBryXtEn6yUdE gsFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from; bh=U2GxqfdymldYXpFrmpoV6T/L6VN/aPLvUF+27UYMKNM=; b=hUfoTUACQKwJ/jyVHKAwJUPvv6zPEHSLYSWFOFcqKT+FPI/GqPT047o5//Uk2UI2ai V+i1g8j20yUnHA4UjqJPOnOo5Lf+Vdo4ma3OXe4Ry+pwpi+YUCIdux3TyLmyRGUrFd8W FRe9eBsG3hidDdvOmHnX2d0bxrKl5jz4pq9gk2bNyRlo1teUyHDKO+NJifSGFUSfDTWJ CQoIHOaHOwnU4ZPEcNOJJ2WYPrkJKlFvQZ1Thc0ESvFEBBxcoIbjI/+ER3qoLxat7gDR ORRkGrUa8nw2TeUZYW4tAKrkeDorAmtnL84yQCXZIXNggCaejZrrc3owLjo1O+qlXTfh oS+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@aosc.io header.s=dkim header.b=tIV6lwpp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c22si1264007otr.97.2020.03.11.09.36.32; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@aosc.io header.s=dkim header.b=tIV6lwpp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730343AbgCKQef (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:34:35 -0400 Received: from hermes.aosc.io ([199.195.250.187]:58112 "EHLO hermes.aosc.io" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730180AbgCKQef (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:34:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: icenowy@aosc.io) by hermes.aosc.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2554C4C335; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:34:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Icenowy Zheng To: Thierry Reding , Sam Ravnborg , Rob Herring , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Ondrej Jirman Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Icenowy Zheng Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: fix horizontal timing calculation Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:33:28 +0800 Message-Id: <20200311163329.221840-5-icenowy@aosc.io> In-Reply-To: <20200311163329.221840-1-icenowy@aosc.io> References: <20200311163329.221840-1-icenowy@aosc.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aosc.io; s=dkim; t=1583944474; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=U2GxqfdymldYXpFrmpoV6T/L6VN/aPLvUF+27UYMKNM=; b=tIV6lwpp+xUu1yh4SMhtRjYtnNU8O1efXGjwMBU6+K4WLy9VFlS6syxUXosBQHHhVI5sXQ wqqe/lJ0Z0jZtgQMh+g7fgIPlImrhm2xCibz4wNeaYLAvpCZYuL5mQc6UnYyZk+jw7Rzhd dd7JFj4hPaMvnnyRnz+4/VYq9QYocXw= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The max() function call in horizontal timing calculation shouldn't pad a length already subtracted with overhead to overhead, instead it should only prevent the set timing to underflow. Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng --- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c index 059939789730..5f2313c40328 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_setup_timings(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, */ #define HSA_PACKET_OVERHEAD 10 hsa = max((unsigned int)HSA_PACKET_OVERHEAD, - (mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start) * Bpp - HSA_PACKET_OVERHEAD); + (mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start) * Bpp) - HSA_PACKET_OVERHEAD; /* * The backporch is set using a blanking packet (4 @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_setup_timings(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, */ #define HBP_PACKET_OVERHEAD 6 hbp = max((unsigned int)HBP_PACKET_OVERHEAD, - (mode->htotal - mode->hsync_end) * Bpp - HBP_PACKET_OVERHEAD); + (mode->htotal - mode->hsync_end) * Bpp) - HBP_PACKET_OVERHEAD; /* * The frontporch is set using a sync event (4 bytes) @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_setup_timings(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, */ #define HFP_PACKET_OVERHEAD 16 hfp = max((unsigned int)HFP_PACKET_OVERHEAD, - (mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay) * Bpp - HFP_PACKET_OVERHEAD); + (mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay) * Bpp) - HFP_PACKET_OVERHEAD; /* * The blanking is set using a sync event (4 bytes) @@ -583,8 +583,8 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_setup_timings(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi, */ #define HBLK_PACKET_OVERHEAD 10 hblk = max((unsigned int)HBLK_PACKET_OVERHEAD, - (mode->htotal - (mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start)) * Bpp - - HBLK_PACKET_OVERHEAD); + (mode->htotal - (mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start)) * Bpp) - + HBLK_PACKET_OVERHEAD; /* * And I'm not entirely sure what vblk is about. The driver in -- 2.24.1