Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio-hammer: Avoid potential overflow in main
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200312094008.1833929-1-gabravier@gmail.com>
 <CAMpxmJUUth5w8tvZp8mFV-FDz0YivmRWAqsOQSTdze1xagMX8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <38cbabe3-151b-1fd6-9d36-f27e9c9aa414@gmail.com>
 <CAMpxmJVSPA9CQBGULyk69KaP42oMdKGg883z0FeFC_mSA5w2xA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Gabriel Ravier <gabravier@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55db9307-9a20-239e-127c-ea043600248d@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:33:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJVSPA9CQBGULyk69KaP42oMdKGg883z0FeFC_mSA5w2xA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Ah, seems like I didn't read the guide to getting code into the kernel 
thoroughly enough. Should I send the patch yet again just with a v2 in 
the subject header or is there no need to bother with that ?

On 3/12/20 3:29 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> czw., 12 mar 2020 o 15:21 Gabriel Ravier <gabravier@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>> Ah, that was accidental. I was applying scripts/Lindent to my code and
>> ended up also having it applied to part of the old code. Didn't think it
>> would hurt, but I guess it makes sense to be this stringent on
>> separating logical changes. Will send a (complete) corrected patch
>> in-reply-to this message.
>>
> Please don't send patches in response to other threads. Always start a
> new thread and increment the version in [PATCH vX] tag.
>
> Bart