Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Received-SPF: Pass (esa2.microchip.iphmx.com: domain of
  Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com designates 198.175.253.82 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa2.microchip.iphmx.com;
  envelope-from="Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com";
  x-sender="Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com";
  x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1";
  x-record-text="v=spf1 mx a:ushub1.microchip.com
  a:smtpout.microchip.com -exists:%{i}.spf.microchip.iphmx.com
  include:servers.mcsv.net include:mktomail.com
  include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all"
Received-SPF: None (esa2.microchip.iphmx.com: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@email.microchip.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa2.microchip.iphmx.com;
  envelope-from="Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@email.microchip.com";
  x-conformance=spf_only
IronPort-SDR: osHwBW0p4Lien6hUp5ADj52VxDTQdETFzFMfXWod8GKRZTpJO5M3ASHi+0SEqOhXnPrkbUXXOl
 M/gUu57piQKGkDep6dCAyN4pxZLdfwuqNC/cFlEcO87jlL3WdU/yH3JWEDpUd8CJ+BXrFdlZfZ
 B98bUM5XRUBk8tdGtNQ0lcutxBIrB3FIrq0l5sWwr4MzNU2HzR/2C7sJvNGIWGTLNT/4whSxqG
 SX6AqJW/wQXd0M2WmnAmSU73xzJy/LHVFrP228q8NGr+qmLoQE4ttLCgCFWr+FR34J6DlTnVXt
 MOA=
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
To:     <vigneshr@ti.com>
CC:     <bbrezillon@kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
        <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <richard@nod.at>, <joel@jms.id.au>,
        <andrew@aj.id.au>, <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>,
        <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <vz@mleia.com>,
        <michal.simek@xilinx.com>, <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
        <john.garry@huawei.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        <nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>, <michael@walle.cc>,
        <dinguyen@kernel.org>, <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>,
        <swboyd@chromium.org>, <opensource@jilayne.com>,
        <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <allison@lohutok.net>, <jethro@fortanix.com>, <info@metux.net>,
        <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>, <rfontana@redhat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] mtd: spi-nor: Trim what is exposed in spi-nor.h
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 23/23] mtd: spi-nor: Trim what is exposed in spi-nor.h
Thread-Index: AQHV+RFE8CpIrLOZFkGknCS7bSfDWA==
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:27:44 +0000
Message-ID: <2602880.RMCP8WUqzX@192.168.1.3>
References: <20200302180730.1886678-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
 <20200302180730.1886678-24-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
 <fcd5742c-70df-7e97-c345-08dad6043ecb@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <fcd5742c-70df-7e97-c345-08dad6043ecb@ti.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microchip.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <766D46C1B0192D4F955576002231EB0B@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 41d0c98a-4850-48e4-a842-08d7c7286781
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Mar 2020 08:27:44.2426
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 3f4057f3-b418-4d4e-ba84-d55b4e897d88
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: udKsMPt4j4TcRfZ1E/ZDIGu+3xUayzJ6XAYgvnBhNPPTgQiYl9HqN7weLlGLHdt5UOdhsICjcVG8+I6JG2BVWP3KtFBNc2UDJDWPd56To34=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7SPR01MB7
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Friday, March 13, 2020 10:13:17 AM EET Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Should we drop SNOR_MFR_* macros as well or do you see a neeed for them?

Good catch. Cross-manufacturer code is unlikely and discouraged, we should =
get=20
rid of them.

Cheers,
ta