Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp1639147ybh; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 04:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu6OPw1bVASbJeETx++wrtQxDnIm1wZ+U+PixlVytc5JJY2dNSVlBy86SSakKBnUKPopfto X-Received: by 2002:a9d:264:: with SMTP id 91mr10953343otb.216.1584100526543; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 04:55:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584100526; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MgjNDh/9pKHqGl0Fj9XhX0Wj5O6c4qYkY+a2du7g9/le6V9G21Zo4YDLWPdDUm5zkX tj72NFPekWmX0B0GH8wGkXN/eN2HjwsNv4cNoBfn2BL6R9VkIX//Z+HKNxKXQ0AhxBGK rmKTi84RBKxIEWGcmpkM+tAt2nEAv5kdoP2YeFqXVmajCCLwW6r+zYNyOCVKBiSEAOMb epj00UfckwVcxq9Q8lSntQP/8WJ8Zwxga8eMpBBEujlTCzy/iHQJvt5ViZXx0ybiP9Qk D8gFom5cKA5BwZHENKrNhknjgEuZxi2nqRdO+QvCD2ravZvXULEQMfuZ160jHQO9P18x 7q7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=P12zTo9nKQ3TC2eob3Bw8GbVbWiKIUND+xb2ynDGwtI=; b=kXt1YtB/SDu7Wg5POv9qiiFuc71XENzm9uKtkQ0N1YLUjqMZYIamh4Qij9HKy+aYVM wKz7rBw8YHhJvZBqCcHAXoD2kPRqD4R4+zATJJtGh5FlAgTeIcjDsKeROkPHD02aZY/o EK5c5zu+g9zp6EwjPE+GyegtbNg3oJbqfMGME49x0P4PTlHcG3xzjN8m4kNzGp6a2Z1m 9flpGHfhR5oxRrgnvIEWZxc8OyRpU4Loy9V+3pWmZ9E+Si3ucdG7FOMSXbTiOeK+qwPI qMDN3E6L6nLFzjzVhlhD8B8wF/a0XutRpp94SfLwK2J6DYuybFYDt1VmxPZUY3kc3PsX DmZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m4si5213088otn.175.2020.03.13.04.55.13; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 04:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726726AbgCMLxE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:53:04 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53476 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726495AbgCMLxE (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:53:04 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9724D30E; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 04:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6E923F534; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 04:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:53:00 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: James Clark Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] perf tools: Add support for some spe events Message-ID: <20200313115300.GE42546@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200228160126.GI36089@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20200306152520.28233-1-james.clark@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200306152520.28233-1-james.clark@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:25:17PM +0000, James Clark wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Yes I think this is something I can look into. For now I have removed > that last patch because the current patch set already works very similarly anyway > and allows people to use SPE in perf: > > ./perf record -e arm_spe_0/branch_filter=1/ > vs > ./perf record -e arm_spe/branch-misses/pp Thanks, FWIW that looks fine to me. > Also I don't have access to any big.LITTLE hardware with SPE so wouldn't be able > to test collating all the SPE PMUs. Likewise, I just want to make sure we don't back ourselves into a corner. Otherwise, I have no comments on these patches, so feel free to take that as: Acked-by: Mark Rutland Mark. > > Thanks > James > > Tan Xiaojun (3): > perf tools: Move arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h/c to the new dir > perf tools: Add support for "report" for some spe events > perf report: Add SPE options to --itrace argument > > tools/perf/Documentation/itrace.txt | 5 +- > tools/perf/util/Build | 2 +- > tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build | 1 + > .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c | 225 ++++++ > .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h | 66 ++ > .../arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 0 > .../arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 2 + > tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 747 +++++++++++++++++- > tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c | 13 + > tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h | 13 +- > 10 files changed, 1032 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h > rename tools/perf/util/{ => arm-spe-decoder}/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c (100%) > rename tools/perf/util/{ => arm-spe-decoder}/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h (96%) > > -- > 2.17.1 >