Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:41:38 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
        Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>,
        John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] MIPS: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()
Message-ID: <20200313121138.GA5985@afzalpc>
References: <20200304203144.GA4323@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200305115759.3186-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
 <20200311053126.GA48442@ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86>
 <20200311090308.GA5060@afzalpc>
 <20200311104217.GA10615@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200311131210.GA5115@afzalpc>
 <20200311160307.GA15464@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200311163249.GA4984@afzalpc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200311163249.GA4984@afzalpc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Thomas,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:02:49PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 05:03:07PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:

> > case ? I guess using handler as dev_id does a better job here.

> > And before doing that, lets clean up some of the IRQF_SHARED usage first.
> > All sni IRQF_SHARED can go away, the interrupt lines are exclusive there. 
> > 
> > loongson2ef/lemote-2f/irq.c: looks like the only user of
> > LOONGSON_NORTH_BRIDGE_IRQ, so IRQF_SHARED could go as well.
> > Could someone confirm that ?
> > 
> > All other need to stay, IMHO.

i am thinking of sending a new patch, with,

1) IRQF_SHARED removed from sni/{a20r.c,pcit.c,rm200.c}
2) IRQF_SHARED kept in,
        kernel/cevt-r4k.c
        dec/setup.c
        pmcs-msp71xx/msp-time.c
        loongson2ef/lemote-2f/irq.c
    and use handler as dev_id in those

Let me know if you have any other thoughts.

Regards
afzal