Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp1814083ybh; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt5bM1KK5zkKKpXNRAOv3SknGiHpJvhL6v+5zKX8z9RBDLXb5DHPVpgTpUqDpTdB3q9KJgY X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4b01:: with SMTP id q1mr10951588otf.168.1584111221278; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584111221; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qNICRYfbPT0GfAMBYA2o7HyNvrH0tfM2l3lnFpN/iA34JtMJtkdZ9WrvRz+/5bLLCS V37yf0RpuFVD/zzRgZrMl7UBSAPxSJYV6Nxpxwo19SIw3UjdhjZYZfEVHVL1asP1w2Jk DqCHezbuuX2Fy+ogIj1zOVxbHM4CvHf4S+QlDyz1CJznuy1IEjEq/L1dE/djyMvzdV91 1sgJVFievjTSqcFV5Ay9xTzwTyTWKVMb16S0Fv4Ej5VPi+3domBvW8L3b9LdHWVeu481 Or/5OQPo3odfF/Z/ukXFPGlPOP8YfT1I7V0ovSsjbSpkdTYuN1ynQhw3k3egk082s2l0 XcRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=EU4H16zDme+i3eZnyDCiPfl70XZCPgYvPsNse/jc2iA=; b=n+G22DagGZjqZ+x/A3hHOXcSTSpXhNqJWxEJunE3nXnhD+5HhfyL03i7aXtluD1A72 K7wN2QCeSBb5E+rLRPtYyva9Qu0cXEVyYEpahJOnvTX3N27Alx//qSGRs5PE6/H8751w AMBAiJM0LxdT/cSWI9vLWIqUaeKBYyF75cLHE2Cu/uBF0wGxQ1FzrcYwUYXFOZ5rPtND kEzb62gkJYMmYqepFRI3OLeReHQM/olmcPVtNCfRF8LdPVt/fxj6Pd+VPaVseLgoMpYD +KpqWewJuuFDtMx/NpYtYqiJX+7FE5LMF9OvlChA7SRvhsTIEm/64T0IpJ0GsfLZ8WPX L7/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i124si4649746oib.172.2020.03.13.07.53.27; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726676AbgCMOww (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:52:52 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:37579 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726643AbgCMOww (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:52:52 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-72-93-95-157.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.93.95.157]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 02DEq6H9007099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:52:06 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 25BB9420E5E; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:52:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:52:06 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Jani Nikula Cc: Steven Rostedt , Geert Uytterhoeven , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Vlastimil Babka , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections -- Change to charter Message-ID: <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> References: <20200313031947.GC225435@mit.edu> <87d09gljhj.fsf@intel.com> <20200313093548.GA2089143@kroah.com> <24c64c56-947b-4267-33b8-49a22f719c81@suse.cz> <20200313100755.GA2161605@kroah.com> <20200313103720.GA2215823@kroah.com> <20200313081216.627c5bdf@gandalf.local.home> <874kusl50q.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874kusl50q.fsf@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Have you considered whether the eligibility for running and voting > should be made the same? As it is, absolutely anyone can self-nominate > and run. That's always been the case. However, at least historically, people who weren't physically present has never been successful. One of the changes last year with the adoption of electronic voting was there was only a written nomination statement and not a short spoken statement before the vote. - Ted