Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:43:18 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
Message-ID: <20060215234317.GC3490@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
References: <200602131116.41964.david-b@pacbell.net> <43F0E724.6000807@cfl.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43F0E724.6000807@cfl.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 808
Lines: 22


> Are you quite certain about that?  This is not 
> the case for SCSI disks, but for USB, maybe it 
> can provide sufficient information to the 
> kernel about state changes without having to do 
> a full rescan.  If that is the case, and the 
> hardware is erroneously reporting that all 
> devices were disconnected and reconnected after 
> an ACPI suspend to disk, then such hardware is 
> broken and the kernel should be patched to work 
> around it. 

No patch was attached...

-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/